Logo What's After the Movie
The Best House in London

The Best House in London 1969

Runtime

97 mins

Language

English

English

Test your knowledge of The Best House in London with our quiz!

The Best House in London Plot Summary

Read the complete plot summary and ending explained for The Best House in London (1969). From turning points to emotional moments, uncover what really happened and why it matters.


Victorian London hums with a strange mix of opulence and underlying tension as Sir Francis Leybourne [George Sanders] stands at the center of a shifting power play. A married aristocrat, land baron, and businessman with far‑reaching interests, he maintains a kept woman, Babette [Dany Robin], who also shares a complicated bond with his estranged son, Walter Leybourne, played by Benjamin Oakes / Walter Leybourne [David Hemmings]. This tangled personal web sets the stage for a public scheme that could rewrite the city’s social order.

Sir Francis is approached by a minister to pilot a bold new experiment—London’s first bordello. The goal is to acknowledge the hidden role of prostitutes in aristocratic society while steering them off the streets and into a controlled, French‑inspired establishment. The plan places Sir Francis at the helm, with the house to be run as a project that would bridge private desire and public reform, a dichotomy that tempts and unsettles everyone involved.

Into this volatile mix steps Josephine Pacefoot [Joanna Pettet], the orphaned niece who leads the League of Social Purity, a reformist movement intent on empowering streetwalkers with skills to escape prostitution. She has allied with Benjamin Oakes [David Hemmings], a publicist by trade, whose current assignment to promote Italian Count Pandolfo’s dirigible becomes a public relations backdrop for their work. Benjamin reveals a deeply personal thread—he is a bastard, the child of a former servant, and the birthmark on his wrist is a quiet, stubborn clue to his uncertain parentage. His partnership with Josephine is more than professional: it’s a chance to publicly chart a humane path for vulnerable women, even as his own past complicates every step of their campaign.

Count Pandolfo [Warren Mitchell] appears as a foaming engine of modern spectacle, building an airship that seems to symbolize progress itself. With Pandolfo in the wings, the pair launches a public push to reshape perceptions of mobility, technology, and class. The story threads through a cast of vivid figures—Sherlock Holmes [Peter Jeffrey] and Doctor Watson [Thorley Walters] lend their sharp wit and observational prowess to the backdrop of political and social maneuvering, while Lily [Veronica Carlson] and other colorful personalities populate the fringes of this high‑stakes drama.

When Sir Francis unexpectedly dies, the will reveals a shocking twist: he has left his entire estate—Belgravia Hall and, crucially, the future of the bordello—to Josephine Pacefoot. Babette, who was to set up the house in his absence, discovers she may be eclipsed by the young reformer’s control over the property. Walter, aided by Babette, makes a concerted effort to claim Belgravia Hall and run the bordello as envisioned, pushing Josephine into a corner she never anticipated. Josephine, in her innocence, imagines the hall as a sanctuary to advance her League’s mission, not as a potential revenue stream for a private establishment.

The conspiracy thickens as the political and criminal undercurrents weave through the narrative. The Home Secretary [John Bird], a press‑savvy editor of The Times [Maurice Denham], and a roguish mix of henchmen and informants—Milton Reid as a henchman and Margaret Nolan as a Busty Prostitute—all move chess pieces on a city map where power, propriety, and principle collide. Inspector MacPherson [Bill Fraser], Lord Tennyson [Hugh Burden], and Lady Dilke [Jan Holden] add layers of intrigue and authority, while the theater and social world mingle in and around a world where a music hall singer [Tessie O’Shea], a host of colorful characters, and a reluctant reform movement brush shoulders with the men who pull the levers of influence.

As the plan unfolds, the bordello becomes not just a business venture but a battleground for ideas about sex, class, reform, and independence. The project tests the boundaries between virtue and vice, between the social purity sought by Josephine and the practical, sometimes morally ambiguous maneuvers of those who think they know what London needs. The cast—ranging from the celebrated stage faces to the sharp-eyed victorians who populate Sir Francis’s glittering world—gives the story texture and texture to the moral questions at its heart.

Throughout the narrative, the characters grapple with loyalty, scandal, and the costs of reform. Flora [Carol Friday] and Flora’s mother [Avril Angers], along with Evelyn [Penny Spencer] and a host of other figures, inhabit the margins of this dramatic experiment, offering humanity, humor, and vulnerability to a plan that could either modernize society or unbalance it beyond repair. The tension between public duty and private desire drives the action, as each player—whether a clever publicist, a noble patron, a sharp‑witted detective, or a compassionate reformer—contributes to a story that asks whether London can accommodate both progress and propriety without losing its soul.

In the end, the fate of Belgravia Hall, the bordello, and the lives entwined around them remains a delicate negotiation between ambition and ethics, between reform and desire, a reflection of a city itself at the crossroads of tradition and change. The film shirts its political and social questions in wit, drama, and a richly drawn ensemble, reminding us that every calculated move in a city of splendor and shadow ripples through the lives of those who inhabit it.

The Best House in London Timeline

Follow the complete movie timeline of The Best House in London (1969) with every major event in chronological order. Great for understanding complex plots and story progression.


Sir Francis Leybourne's public life and private affairs

In Victorian London, Sir Francis Leybourne is a powerful aristocrat, city councillor, land baron, and businessman. He keeps a mistress, Babette, who is also sleeping with his estranged son Walter. Babette and Walter scheme to secure Walter's place in the will as the primary beneficiary, stirring tension behind Sir Francis's back.

Late 19th century, London, before Sir Francis' death London

The minister's Bordello pilot plan

A minister asks Sir Francis to head the pilot project for London's first bordello. The aim is to understand the role of prostitutes in aristocratic society while moving them off the streets. The bordello is to be modeled on the French approach.

Early in the bordello initiative London

Josephine Pacefoot and the League of Social Purity

Josephine Pacefoot, Sir Francis's orphaned niece, leads the League of Social Purity, a reformist group that trains streetwalkers to exit prostitution. She teams up with Benjamin Oakes, a freelance publicist who is currently hired to publicize the work of Italian Count Pandolfo and his dirigible project. The collaboration brings a crosscurrent of reform and publicity to the social scene of London.

Concurrent with the bordello pilot London

Benjamin Oakes joins Josephine's cause

Benjamin Oakes's publicist work centers on Count Pandolfo's dirigible, but he also agrees to help publicize Josephine's reform efforts. He becomes a bridge between reform and publicity, weaving their causes together. This alliance marks the start of a public-facing campaign in London.

Around the same period as the pilot London

Walter and Babette's scheme to claim Walter's inheritance

Walter, aided by Babette, schemes to rewrite Sir Francis's will so that Walter becomes the primary beneficiary. They set their sights on Belgravia Hall and on operating the bordello as planned. The scheme foreshadows a clash between family interest and the reform project.

Leading up to Sir Francis's death London

Sir Francis's sudden death and the will

Sir Francis unexpectedly dies while on a business trip to India. He leaves his entire estate to his niece Josephine Pacefoot, including Belgravia Hall. He also instructs that Babette handle the bordello's setup during his absence.

During a business trip to India India

Babette is tasked with setting up the bordello at Belgravia Hall

Following Sir Francis's death, Babette moves to set up the bordello at Belgravia Hall as his designated executor of the plan. She begins arranging the property and staff to transform the house into the bordello. This places her at odds with Josephine, who inherited the estate.

Immediately after death Belgravia Hall, London

Josephine inherits the estate but aims to run the League

Josephine inherits the estate and intends to use Belgravia Hall for the League of Social Purity. Walter and Babette, however, press their claim and attempt to seize the property from Josephine to run the bordello. A power struggle ensues over the fate of the house.

After death Belgravia Hall, London

The property dispute escalates

Walter and Babette press their claim using whatever means necessary to take Belgravia Hall from Josephine. Josephine remains unaware of Sir Francis's secret plan for the house. The conflict over the property becomes a central tension in the story.

Post-death Belgravia Hall

Benjamin reveals his paternity to Josephine

During their collaboration, Benjamin Oakes reveals that he is a bastard, his mother was a servant who never disclosed his father. The birthmark on his wrist is the only clue to his paternal identity. This confession adds a personal dimension to the political drama surrounding the estate.

During alliance with Josephine London

Count Pandolfo's dirigible remains a public backdrop

Benjamin's publicity work also promotes Count Pandolfo's dirigible project. The airship provides a modern, spectacular contrast to the reformist agenda. The dirigible backdrop intertwines with the capital's social intrigues.

Throughout the period London

Clash of ideals: reform vs bordello plans

The usages of Belgravia Hall become the focal point of a clash between Josephine's reformist stance and Walter/Babette's profit-driven bordello plan. The battle over control of the house highlights the tension between social reform and exploitation. The outcome remains unresolved, setting the stage for ongoing conflict.

Following the death Belgravia Hall

The Best House in London Characters

Explore all characters from The Best House in London (1969). Get detailed profiles with their roles, arcs, and key relationships explained.


Benjamin Oakes / Walter Leybourne (David Hemmings)

A publicity-minded figure entangled in a complex family history and a public-private mission. He collaborates with Josephine to advance her reform goals while balancing his own ambitions and paternal mystery. His dual identity and wit drive much of the movie’s intrigue and negotiation.

💼 Publicist 🧭 Identity & Paternity 💔 Infidelity

Sir Francis Leybourne (George Sanders)

A powerful aristocrat, landowner, and businessman whose imminent death reshapes the inheritance and the fate of Belgravia Hall. He orchestrates the bordello plan as part of a larger strategy to control wealth and influence, masking it with a veneer of philanthropy and reform.

👑 Aristocracy 💰 Wealth & Influence 💔 Hypocrisy

Babette (Dany Robin)

A kept woman connected to Sir Francis and Walter, using her position to navigate power and property. She becomes a pivotal figure in the scheme surrounding Belgravia Hall, balancing loyalty with personal survival.

💃 Prostitution/Companionship 💰 Allied Interests 🤫 Secrets

Josephine Pacefoot (Joanna Pettet)

An orphaned reformer who leads the League of Social Purity, determined to give streetwalkers new skills and independence. Her idealism clashes with aristocratic schemes, creating a clash between moral goals and realpolitik.

🧭 Reformist 👩‍⚖️ Social Purity 💔 Naivety

Count Pandolfo (Warren Mitchell)

An Italian count associated with an ambitious dirigible project, serving as the public-facing contract for Benjamin’s publicity work. His ambitions intersect with high-tech modernity and the political nuances of London’s elite.

🎈 Dirigible/Innovation 💼 Politics & Power 🌍 Modernization

The Best House in London Settings

Learn where and when The Best House in London (1969) takes place. Explore the film’s settings, era, and how they shape the narrative.


Time period

Victorian era (19th century)

Set against the backdrop of late 19th-century London, a time of strict social mores and burgeoning reform movements. The era’s wealth disparity and evolving technologies, like the airship project, fuel the plots and power dynamics. Public morality versus private vice becomes a running tension throughout the narrative.

Location

London, Belgravia Hall

The story unfolds in Victorian London, a city defined by grand estates and grinding urban life. Belgravia Hall stands at the center of aristocratic privilege and the scheme to convert a noble residence into a bordello. The setting contrasts opulent drawing rooms with the realities faced by streetwalkers and reformers, shaping every scheme and confrontation.

🏙️ London 👑 Aristocracy 💼 Wealth & Power

The Best House in London Themes

Discover the main themes in The Best House in London (1969). Analyze the deeper meanings, emotional layers, and social commentary behind the film.


💼

Power & Prostitution

A powerful aristocrat contemplates opening London’s first bordello, using his influence to steer social change while preserving his own comforts. The scheme treats sex as a tool of social control within the elite, exposing hypocrisy beneath polished surfaces. The clash between public reputation and private desire drives much of the plot and conflict.

🔍

Secrecy & Scandal

A web of secrets surrounds Sir Francis's estate and the planned bordello, including a hidden inheritance and shifting loyalties. Babette’s involvement with both Sir Francis and Walter adds layers of manipulation and risk. The revelation of intentions and relations threatens to upend everyone’s carefully constructed plans.

🏛️

Social Reform

Josephine Pacefoot leads a reformist League aimed at empowering streetwalkers with skills to leave prostitution, highlighting competing visions of progress. The tension between reformers and aristocrats frames debates about morality, charity, and social engineering. The story uses satire to explore whether reform can coexist with or threaten elite interests.

Mobile App Preview

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Mobile App

From blockbusters to hidden gems — dive into movie stories anytime, anywhere. Save your favorites, discover plots faster, and never miss a twist again.

Sign up to be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private — always.

The Best House in London Spoiler-Free Summary

Discover the spoiler-free summary of The Best House in London (1969). Get a concise overview without any spoilers.


In the fog‑shrouded streets of Victorian London, the British Government commissions an unprecedented social experiment: a grand, French‑inspired establishment that will house the city’s prostitutes in opulent comfort while publicly acknowledging their hidden role in aristocratic life. The project is billed as the “best place in town,” a glittering venue where decadence meets a calculated reform, set against a backdrop of gas‑lit boulevards, soot‑stained factories, and the glitter of high society.

At the heart of the scheme stands Sir Francis Leybourne, a married aristocrat, land baron, and shrewd businessman tasked with turning the vision into reality. His personal world is tangled with Babette, his long‑kept companion, and their estranged son Walter Leybourne, whose ambitions clash with his father’s legacy. Their relationships crackle with unspoken desire and rivalry, hinting at the personal stakes that will swirl through the public venture.

Opposite Leybourne’s polished circle is Josephine Pacefoot, a zealous niece who leads the League of Social Purity, determined to empower streetwalkers with dignity and skill. She teams with Benjamin Oakes, a charismatic publicist whose own mysterious lineage adds a quiet undercurrent to his crusade. Their campaign finds an unlikely ally in Count Pandolfo, an eccentric inventor whose dirigible project symbolizes the era’s feverish drive toward progress. Meanwhile, iconic figures such as Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson linger on the periphery, offering razor‑sharp observation and a wry commentary on the city’s moral gymnastics.

The film swirls with lavish set pieces, wry wit, and a tone that balances satirical critique with genuine empathy. It paints a London caught between the glitter of aristocratic excess and the gritty urgency of social change, where every polished chandelier casts a shadow of intrigue. Within this sumptuous tableau, characters navigate ambition, propriety, and desire, inviting the audience to wonder how far a society will go to reconcile progress with its own hidden vices.

Can’t find your movie? Request a summary here.

Movies with Similar Twists and Themes

Uncover films that echo the narrative beats, emotional arcs, or dramatic twists of the one you're exploring. These recommendations are handpicked based on story depth, thematic resonance, and spoiler-worthy moments — perfect for fans who crave more of the same intrigue.


© 2026 What's After the Movie. All rights reserved.