The Case of the Howling Dog 1934

A Los Angeles legal thriller anchored by a cynical will and a deadly mystery, this story follows Perry Mason as he untangles a web spun from love, deceit, and a dog that unites or tears apart a family.

Millionaire Arthur Cartwright Gordon Westcott visits the city to have his will drawn up, convinced that the howling of a German Shepherd next door signals a death and a chance to direct his fortune. He intends to leave the money to the apparent wife of Clinton Foley Russell Hicks, a man Cartwright believes is inducing a sham marriage. The lawyer Perry Mason Warren William explains how the bequest should read, takes a hefty retainer, and hands Cartwright a fill-in form to return. The very next day, Cartwright has altered the beneficiary to Foley’s real wife, a change that binds Mason to defend the true interests of Bessie Foley, Foley’s spouse, who is not what she seems to be on the surface.

From the moment Foley files a complaint of insanity against Cartwright, alleging that Cartwright’s erratic behavior pushed his staff away, the case takes on a chilling momentum. A sheriff’s deputy is assigned to help investigate, and Mason accompanies him back to Foley’s house, where questions multiply. Why is a new garage addition being built if Foley’s chauffeur has quit? Enter Lucy Benton Dorothy Tree, Foley’s housekeeper who bursts out with a bandaged hand and claims to be aiding her employer while revealing that Evelyn, the supposed wife of Cartwright, has vanished after leaving a note saying she loves Cartwright and is running away with him. Cartwright’s overnight disappearance the same night deepens the mystery, and a telegram from Ventura, signed by Evelyn, adds another layer of intrigue.

As Mason’s team digs deeper, they uncover a tangled past: Evelyn was actually Cartwright’s wife who felled into a partnership with Clinton Foley during happier times in Santa Barbara, while Lucy had served as Foley’s private secretary. She and Foley share a complicated history that foreshadows the emotional and legal stakes of the case. A cab arrives at Foley’s home, carrying a woman in black who asserts she wants justice; the dog is released to attack this intruder, who is not easily identified, and the dog’s death and Foley’s own murder come quickly after. A perfumed handkerchief left in the cab ties “Bessie” to the crime, and Mason’s team tracks down the cab driver, with Della Street Helen Trenholme—Mason’s trusted secretary—impersonating Bessie to move the narrative forward.

Perry sees through the cab driver’s misidentification when he demonstrates that Della has been misread, and the case pivots to the truth of the people around the dog. The defense builds a persuasive case around Lucy’s dual handwriting—lucid proof that the killer could be ambidextrous—and Mason orchestrates a dramatic shift to the crime scene itself, highlighting how the dog’s loyalty stretched across all three women who could have become its caregiver. The diary page Mason seizes from Lucy’s entries becomes a crucial clue, revealing the day after Cartwright disappeared and clarifying the sequence of loyalties, betrayals, and motives.

The trial then explodes into a courtroom confrontation where Mason’s cross-examination dismantles key eyewitness claims. He challenges the cab driver’s identification and reveals Lucy’s allowed role in the note, the telegram, and the diary page, using precise inference to expose the web of infidelity and self-preservation that followed Cartwright’s death. As the courtroom drama unfolds, the jury is forced to confront the possibility that the killer was one of the women connected to Cartwright and Foley, not the grieving wife who would appear most innocent.

Meanwhile, workers excavate the garage foundation and unexpectedly uncover the bodies of Cartwright and Evelyn, murdered by Foley in a fatal act of self-preservation or vengeance. With the case pivoting once again, Bessie Foley is acquitted after Mason argues that the dog’s devotion to her proves she would not have been the killer, and that the defense’s closing argument has driven home the idea that the other links to the crime have crumbled. Mason’s final gambit is a symbolic gift—a dog that resembles the one that died—which he presents to Bessie, a gesture intended to show she can move forward with her life without fear of retribution. The detective work, the courtroom strategy, and the moral questions of justice come full circle as Mason refuses to push the law beyond its proper boundaries, suggesting that the truth—like the dog’s loyalty—can be both protective and elusive.

In the end, Mason explains to Della Street that Bessie’s actions were likely in self-defense and that the legal system’s protection against double jeopardy means she cannot be retried. The result is a meticulous, morally layered finale that underscores Mason’s insistence on thorough investigation, careful reasoning, and the careful weighing of evidence before passing judgment. The film closes on a quiet, restrained note, with justice delivered through a combination of clever legal maneuvering and a dogged commitment to the truth.