Logo What's After the Movie
From the Hip

From the Hip 1987

Directed by

Bob Clark

Bob Clark

Made by

DEG

DEG

Test your knowledge of From the Hip with our quiz!

From the Hip Plot Summary

Read the complete plot summary and ending explained for From the Hip (1987). From turning points to emotional moments, uncover what really happened and why it matters.


Fresh out of law school, Robin “Stormy” Weathers, [Judd Nelson], cannot stand the tedium of case filing and research. Desperately wanting to “practice law” and go to trial, one morning he intentionally withholds the fact that a trial is scheduled to begin that very afternoon to compel his superiors to let him try the case because he is the only one familiar with the facts of the case. During his meeting with the client (the president of a bank who intentionally struck another banker), the banker declares the “simple assault case” to be a no-winner (explaining that he hits people all the time), but wants the one-day trial to somehow be stretched to three days to run up the other banker’s court fees.

Weathers prolongs the case by creating a First Amendment constitutional challenge as to the admissibility of the word “asshole,” escalating the case into a media frenzy. The senior partners of the law firm are embarrassed by Weathers’ behavior and unconventional methods and try to fire him. The client retaliates on Weathers’ behalf by threatening to take the bank’s business elsewhere. Weathers appears to be crafty and intuitive, but in reality, had conspired with the other attorney (a friend of his) to stage a brilliant legal engagement to make themselves look good. Weathers wins the trial and in doing so attracts a plethora of new clients to the firm which skyrockets him to be a junior partner.

In an act of unfair retaliation, Weathers is assigned to be lead defense counsel in a first-degree murder case involving university professor Douglas Benoit, [John Hurt], who is almost certainly guilty of bludgeoning a prostitute to death with the claw of a hammer. Benoit wanted Weathers because he saw him in the previous case. Weathers takes the case and his loud and odd courtroom behavior soon amazes the judge, the spectators and sometimes embarrasses his girlfriend Jo Ann, [Elizabeth Perkins]. Determined to impress his employers by winning a verdict of not guilty, no matter what, his courtroom antics soon visibly gain even the jury’s favor and raise the likelihood of acquittal.

Weathers unsuccessfully tries to get Benoit to accept a plea-bargain to manslaughter charges and soon discovers that Benoit is guilty: in a thinly veiled confession used to taunt his own defense attorney, Benoit vividly describes to him the “clarity of mind” it takes for a man to be able to split someone’s skull open with the claw of a hammer… while the person remains alive. Weathers becomes conflicted between his sense of duty and ethics and his moral obligation to see Benoit pay for his crime. Despite the possibility of being disbarred, he decides to antagonize Benoit into a confession on the stand.

From the Hip Timeline

Follow the complete movie timeline of From the Hip (1987) with every major event in chronological order. Great for understanding complex plots and story progression.


Fresh out of law school, Stormy fights boredom

Robin 'Stormy' Weathers is fed up with the tedium of filing and research. He withholds knowledge of an impending trial to pressure his firm to let him try it, convinced he alone understands the facts.

Early career, day one Law firm

Banker client pushes for a multi-day spectacle

In a meeting with the bank's president, the case is a simple assault that the client wants stretched to three days to inflate court fees. The banker hints that keeping the case high-profile benefits the bank's interests.

During case planning Bank office

Stormy triggers a 1st Amendment gambit

Weathers extends the case by raising a First Amendment challenge about the word 'asshole', turning the proceedings into a media frenzy. He uses provocative rhetoric to grab public attention and put pressure on opponents.

Mid-trial escalation Courtroom / media spotlight

Firm leadership moves to fire him

The senior partners are embarrassed by Stormy's antics and attempt to fire him. They worry his methods threaten the firm's reputation and client relationships.

Following media frenzy Law firm conference room

Bank retaliates to protect its business

The client fights back by threatening to move the bank's business elsewhere if Stormy continues his unorthodox tactics. The threat puts pressure on the firm to discipline him.

After the court controversy Bank offices / firm offices

Conspiracy revealed: a staged engagement

It is revealed that Stormy, despite appearing crafty, conspired with the other attorney to stage a brilliant legal engagement to boost their image. The revelation suggests a calculated plan behind the flashy public victory. The firm grapples with ethical implications.

During the case preparations Law firm

Stormy wins the initial trial and rises

Stormy wins the case, drawing a flood of new clients to the firm and earning a promotion to junior partner. The victory cements his reputation as a fearless, if controversial, litigator.

After the trial Courtroom / firm

Assigned to a murder case as retaliation

In an act of unfair retaliation, he is assigned to lead defense in a first-degree murder case against university professor Douglas Benoit. Benoit chose Stormy because he saw him in the prior case.

Shortly after first trial Courtroom / university setting

Stormy's courtroom theatrics win attention

Stormy's loud, odd courtroom behavior impresses the judge and spectators, although he occasionally embarrasses his girlfriend Jo Ann. His showmanship raises the chances of an acquittal.

During Benoit trial Courtroom

Plea negotiations attempt and Benoit's refusal

Stormy pushes for a plea to manslaughter, but Benoit stubbornly refuses. The attempt intensifies the moral tension and the stakes of the case.

Early in trial Courtroom

Discovery: Benoit is guilty; confession in hidden form

Stormy discovers Benoit is guilty when a vague confession reveals the method. Benoit's description shows the 'clarity of mind' needed to split a skull with a hammer, describing the act in chilling detail.

Later in trial Courtroom / interrogation room

Moral dilemma seals Stormy's choice

Facing possible disbarment, Stormy chooses to antagonize Benoit into a direct confession on the stand, prioritizing duty over ethics. The decision marks a moral tipping point in his career and sets up a dramatic courtroom confrontation.

Climax Courtroom

From the Hip Characters

Explore all characters from From the Hip (1987). Get detailed profiles with their roles, arcs, and key relationships explained.


Robin 'Stormy' Weathers (Judd Nelson)

A driven, unconventional young lawyer eager to be trusted with a trial. He uses flamboyant courtroom stunts to short-circuit traditional filing and research, blurring ethics with bravado. His charm and intelligence mask a ruthless belief that spectacle can win cases and clients. This tension drives the plot as he balances ambition with moral considerations.

🎭 Ambitious 🧠 Clever 🗣️ Showman

Douglas Benoit (John Hurt)

A university professor accused of murder, almost certainly guilty according to the defense. He taunts his attorney with glimpses of his brutal worldview and the clarity he believes violence requires. His thinly veiled confession on the stand becomes a pivotal moment, challenging Weathers' ethics and strategy. Benoit embodies a chilling intellectual menace that tests the limits of legal defense.

🧠 Intellectual ⚖️ Guilty 🗝️ Calculating

Jo Ann (Elizabeth Perkins)

Weathers' girlfriend who witnesses his courtroom antics with a mix of pride and embarrassment. She represents the personal cost of a career built on dramatics and public spectacle. Her perspective adds a human dimension to the professional battles, highlighting the strain between love and ambition. She anchors the emotional core of Weathers' life outside the courtroom.

💑 Supportive 🌀 Turbulent 🎭 Romantic

From the Hip Settings

Learn where and when From the Hip (1987) takes place. Explore the film’s settings, era, and how they shape the narrative.


Time period

Mid to late 1980s

The events take place in a contemporary 1980s legal landscape, characterized by aggressive advocacy and media attention. Courtroom theatrics and rapid information flow reflect the era’s appetite for sensational, televised moments. The period’s tools and communication styles shape how cases are argued and public opinion is formed.

Location

Law Firm, Courthouse, Bank

The story unfolds across a modern American law firm and the surrounding city’s courthouse, with the bank as the financial anchor of the case. The settings emphasize the contrast between sleek offices and tense trial rooms where high-stakes decisions drive careers. These locations ground the narrative in a professional world where reputation and results matter.

🏢 Urban setting 🏛️ Legal drama 🏦 Corporate world

From the Hip Themes

Discover the main themes in From the Hip (1987). Analyze the deeper meanings, emotional layers, and social commentary behind the film.


⚖️

Ethics vs Ambition

Robin 'Stormy' Weathers pursues win-at-all-costs tactics to prove himself in court. The film probes whether professional success justifies ethically questionable methods. It questions the boundaries of legal practice when ambition and personal gain collide with duty. The narrative shows that the pursuit of glory can tempt moral compromise.

🗞️

Media Frenzy

The case becomes a public spectacle, fueling sensational headlines and crowd interest. The 1st Amendment debate is framed as a clash between free expression and courtroom decorum. Reporters and public attention influence perceptions and potentially outcomes. The story critiques how press coverage can distort truth and pressure legal decisions.

🏛️

Public Image and Power

A firm’s power hinges on reputation, client acquisition, and visible success in the courtroom. Weathers’ flamboyant tactics are weighed against professional responsibilities and firm advancement. The plot shows how public perception can grant or strip authority within legal institutions. Personal cunning and strategic image-building become as consequential as legal argument.

Mobile App Preview

Coming soon on iOS and Android

The Plot Explained Mobile App

From blockbusters to hidden gems — dive into movie stories anytime, anywhere. Save your favorites, discover plots faster, and never miss a twist again.

Sign up to be the first to know when we launch. Your email stays private — always.

From the Hip Spoiler-Free Summary

Discover the spoiler-free summary of From the Hip (1987). Get a concise overview without any spoilers.


In the high‑pressure world of a Manhattan‑based law firm, fresh‑out‑of‑law‑school Robin Weathers is desperate to prove he can do more than file papers. He craves the thrill of the courtroom, the roar of a jury, and the swagger that comes with being noticed. The firm’s polished corridors and its senior partners exude a cool, measured professionalism, but beneath that veneer lies a relentless chase for billable hours and high‑profile victories. When a seemingly mundane civil dispute lands on his desk, Robin sees an opportunity to catapult himself from anonymous associate to rising star, even if it means bending the rules and courting the media’s relentless appetite for drama.

The tone of the film blends sharp legal satire with the nervous energy of a young professional navigating a cut‑throat corporate culture. Robin’s flamboyant tactics and quick‑thinking bravado turn the case into a public spectacle, drawing both admiration and suspicion from colleagues and clients alike. His daring maneuvering earns him a rapid promotion, yet it also leaves a trail of questions about the cost of ambition and the thin line between cleverness and ethical compromise.

Just as his ascent seems secure, the firm assigns Robin a far more consequential defense: a celebrated university professor facing a serious criminal charge. The new case forces Robin to step out of the courtroom circus and confront the deeper moral weight of his profession. Alongside his steady‑hearted girlfriend Jo Ann, he must balance his hunger for success with a growing awareness that every victory has a price, and that integrity may be the most demanding client of all.

Can’t find your movie? Request a summary here.

Movies with Similar Twists and Themes

Uncover films that echo the narrative beats, emotional arcs, or dramatic twists of the one you're exploring. These recommendations are handpicked based on story depth, thematic resonance, and spoiler-worthy moments — perfect for fans who crave more of the same intrigue.


© 2025 What's After the Movie. All rights reserved.