Ghost Stories 2020

Art & Craft

Artistic execution varies throughout the anthology. Banerjee’s segment showcases confident direction and effective use of monochromatic visuals, while Zoya Akhtar’s short benefits from solid set design. Conversely, several pieces suffer from inconsistent cinematography and rudimentary editing, leading to a diluted atmospheric impact. The overall craft therefore oscillates between moments of competence and noticeable technical shortcomings.

Character & Emotion

Character work is similarly inconsistent. Performances by Janhvi Kapoor and Surekha Sikri receive praise for nuanced expression, yet many protagonists lack clear backstory, limiting emotional resonance. The third story’s lead delivers a compelling portrayal, but other segments feature wooden acting and subpar dubbing, undermining audience connection. Consequently, character depth fluctuates, offering occasional strength amid generally flat portrayals.

Story & Flow

Storytelling across the four shorts suffers from uneven pacing and vague narratives. The first segment’s premise is introduced but never reaches a satisfying crescendo, leaving viewers confused. The second’s monochrome aesthetic adds intrigue yet fails to articulate character motives. Only the third story presents a clear, engaging plot, while the fourth relies on predictable tropes. Overall, narrative cohesion is limited, resulting in a fragmented anthology.

Sensory Experience

Auditory and visual elements are a mixed bag. The third vignette leverages effective sound design and eerie scoring to heighten tension, whereas other entries rely on generic CGI and thin sound effects. Monochromatic cinematography in the second short contributes to a bleak atmosphere, yet uneven lighting in the first diminishes impact. These sensory choices intermittently succeed but often fall short of delivering a cohesive horror experience.

Rewatch Factor

Replay value is limited as most segments feel rushed and lack memorable hooks, discouraging repeat viewings. While the third story garners some appreciation for its subtle social critique, the remaining pieces are described as forgettable or overly predictable, reducing incentive for re-engagement. Consequently, the anthology offers minimal lasting appeal, making it unlikely to be revisited by most audiences.