Pokémon the Movie: Mewtwo Strikes Back - Evolution 2019

Art & Craft

In terms of art and craft, the film showcases a refreshed visual palette and high‑resolution CGI that enhance battle scenes. However, several reviewers criticize the inconsistent texture rendering and occasional artificial‑looking character models. The editing remains straightforward, preserving the original pacing without notable innovation. Overall, the artistic upgrades are noticeable but marred by uneven execution, yielding a mixed impression of the film's craftsmanship.

Character & Emotion

When assessing character and emotion, the remake falls short of the original's expressive nuance. Viewers report that human characters, particularly Ash, lack the vocal warmth and facial subtlety that conveyed depth in the 1998 version. Some moments, such as Mewtwo's interaction with Ash, retain a hint of heart, yet the majority of performances feel flat and unengaging. Consequently, the character work is perceived as a weaker element of the film.

Story & Flow

Regarding story and flow, the narrative adheres closely to the 1998 script, offering a familiar plot with minimal new content. Critics note the absence of fresh thematic angles, while a few viewers appreciate the faithful retelling. Pacing remains measured, but the lack of originality diminishes overall engagement. The story thus registers as competent but unremarkable, reflecting a balance of acceptance and disappointment.

Sensory Experience

In the sensory experience domain, the film's upgraded visuals receive commendation for vibrant color grading and dynamic battle choreography. The sound design, however, is criticized for omitting the original soundtrack's iconic tracks, leaving a noticeable auditory gap. While the musical score attempts to contemporary tones, it fails to capture the nostalgic resonance. The visual strengths outweigh the auditory shortcomings, resulting in a moderately positive sensory assessment.

Rewatch Factor

The rewatch factor appears limited, as many reviewers cite the film's heavy reliance on nostalgia without delivering sufficient novelty. Although younger audiences and die‑hard fans might enjoy a second viewing for its visual flair, the majority find the story and character gaps reduce repeat appeal. Consequently, the movie's lasting value and incentive for multiple viewings are perceived as relatively low.