Incision 2020

Art & Craft

In terms of art and craft, Incision exhibits uneven direction and choppy editing that disrupt the film’s flow. Reviewers describe scenes that abruptly stop or fade, indicating a lack of cohesive visual storytelling. The cinematography offers little stylistic flair, and production design feels inexpensive, contributing to an overall shallow aesthetic.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character and emotion, the majority of feedback highlights consistently poor performances. Multiple reviewers condemn the acting as atrocious and the protagonists as unlikable, noting a lack of depth and chemistry. A solitary positive note mentions one character that elicits sympathy, but this isolated strength does not compensate for the pervasive weak portrayals throughout the cast.

Story & Flow

Story-wise, Incision suffers from a disjointed plot and predictable narrative beats. Critics and users alike describe the screenplay as weak, with implausible motivations and minimal tension. The pacing drags as the film spends excessive time on uninspired character introductions before delivering scant horror set pieces, resulting in a bland and unsatisfying storyline.

Sensory Experience

Regarding sensory experience, the film offers limited gore and subpar special effects, which reviewers label as cheap and ineffective. Sound design receives little comment, implying it fails to enhance tension. The overall visual and auditory presentation feels underwhelming, further diminishing the horror atmosphere the film attempts to create.

Rewatch Factor

Incision provides little incentive for repeat viewings. The consensus among reviewers is that the movie fails to deliver satisfying scares or narrative payoff, making subsequent watches feel redundant. While a few viewers found niche enjoyment in its creepy antagonist, the overall lackluster execution undermines its rewatch value.