I Was at Home, But . . . 2019

Art & Craft

The film’s direction and visual craft are marked by minimalistic composition and expressive details that many critics find formally impressive. Its deliberate pacing and measured editing contribute to a refined aesthetic, yet some reviewers describe it as a stilted installation with unengaging cuts. The overall visual execution therefore feels ambitious but uneven, reflecting both strong artistic intent and occasional technical shortcomings.

Character & Emotion

Performances anchor the work with a tender, nuanced portrayal of grief and family, earning praise for emotional resonance. The central actor’s work is highlighted as particularly compelling, while the film’s Bresson‑style delivery renders characters somewhat opaque. This combination of deep feeling and restrained expressiveness results in a generally strong character impression that may feel distant to some viewers.

Story & Flow

Narratively, the film embraces fragmentation, offering multiple possible interpretations and an elliptical, puzzle‑like structure. Critics commend its boldness and willingness to defy conventional plot, yet the absence of clear narrative progression is noted as disengaging by a user reviewer. Consequently, the story is perceived as deliberately ambiguous, providing intellectual intrigue at the expense of straightforward coherence.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements, including understated color palettes and precise sound design, are described as expressive and immersive, contributing to a vivid cinematic experience. Some critics liken sections to a static photographic installation, suggesting moments of visual rigidity. Overall, the sensory composition is striking and contributes significantly to the film’s atmospheric impact, though occasional stasis is observed.

Rewatch Factor

The film’s lingering gestures and thought‑provoking ambiguity motivate repeated viewings for audiences seeking deeper meaning. Critics emphasize its capacity to occupy viewers’ minds after the screening, while a user found it insufficiently engaging to finish. This contrast yields a moderate to high rewatch potential, particularly for viewers who appreciate reflective, non‑linear cinema.