Haunting of the Queen Mary 2023

Art & Craft

In terms of art and craft, the film is lauded for its striking cinematography and elaborate production design that capture the grandeur of the Queen Mary. Reviewers highlight the opulent lighting, period‑accurate costumes and well‑composed interior shots as major assets. However, criticism is directed at the editing, which many feel appears rushed and hampers narrative flow. Overall, the visual craftsmanship stands out despite structural shortcomings.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character and emotion, critics note that performances are competent but the roles lack depth and distinctiveness. Actors are described as doing their best with thin material, and only occasional moments, such as the Ratch family’s daughter, receive modest praise. The chemistry between the present‑day protagonists is viewed as flat, and motivations remain unclear. Consequently, audience connection to the characters is minimal.

Story & Flow

The story dimension receives the strongest criticism, with reviewers repeatedly calling the plot incoherent, confusing, and overly reliant on abrupt timeline jumps. The dual narratives fail to intersect meaningfully, leaving the central mystery unresolved until the very end. Lack of logical progression and unexplained plot points undermine engagement, resulting in a viewing experience that feels more like a disjointed series of scenes than a cohesive horror tale.

Sensory Experience

In sensory terms, the film excels in visual atmosphere, with many reviewers praising its lavish sets, period‑accurate costumes and striking lighting that create an immersive ship environment. The sound design and musical score receive fewer mentions, suggesting they are serviceable but unremarkable. Overall, the sensory experience is a highlight, providing a richly textured backdrop that partially offsets narrative deficiencies.

Rewatch Factor

The rewatch factor is low, as most critics describe the film as confusing, tedious and lacking lasting appeal. The disjointed narrative and weak character investment deter repeat viewings, and several reviewers state they would not return to finish the film. While the visual style offers momentary enjoyment, it is insufficient to motivate a second viewing, resulting in limited replay value.