Call of Heroes 2016

In a fractured, post-Qing China, the map is a rough mosaic of rival military governors, each asserting control over scattered towns and roads with little mercy. At the heart of this upheaval stands Cao Shaolun Louis Koo, a ruthless figure who roams Shitoucheng with a chilling ease, delighting in the random killing and plunder that unnerves civilians and erodes trust in any stable authority. The violence he sows casts a long shadow over the region, turning once-quiet streets into lines of fear and suspicion.

As refugees flee toward safety, a schoolteacher named Ms Pak flees with her students and seeks asylum in Pucheng, a town governed by a different ruler and watched by a wary, makeshift militia led by Colonel Yang Kenan Sean Lau. The arrival of the refugees unsettles an already fragile balance, and the townspeople cling to the presence of the militia as a last line of defense against chaos. Amid this tense backdrop, the film introduces a broader cast of local figures who become entangled in this struggle for survival and order.

Cho, a man who embodies the unpredictable cruelty of the period, murders Pak’s cousin and one of her students in a brutal display of power. He is sentenced to death, a sentence that seems straightforward until the powerful forces behind him move to overturn it. Cho’s father, a figure who commands his own military strength, arrives with an implicit threat: release Cho, or the town will face massacre. Colonel Yang Kenan faces an impossible choice between due process and the immediate demand to protect civilians, a dilemma that exposes the fragility of law in a land splintered by competing loyalties.

Two of Cho’s commanders worry about the human cost of continuing the arrest. They attempt a nocturnal rescue to break Cho free and strike at the heart of the prison, yet the disciplined militia holds firm, repelling the raid and signaling that improvisation cannot win against a determined, organized opposition. The situation worsens when wealthy interests within the town mobilize private guards to press for Cho’s freedom, threatening violence against Yang Kenan and his few remaining allies if their demand is not met. The militia’s resolve is tested to the breaking point as public sentiment flares, and crowds insist that Cho be released to spare the town from further bloodshed—an argument that pits public fear against civil order and the duty of leadership.

Reluctantly, Yang Kenan disbands the militia in a bid to prevent further bloodshed, but dawn reveals a harsher reality: Cho’s soldiers have broken free and now plunder the town with impunity. The balance of power shifts violently as the remaining defenders rally to the cause of protecting the townspeople. The survivors organize a defensive response—bombing the enemy camp, laying traps in the streets, and arming those who had once lived in fear—turning civilians into a makeshift militia of their own. In this crucible of desperation, the community learns to improvise, improvise, and improvise again, showing both the resilience and the limits of popular resistance.

The tide of violence reaches its climax when Cho is finally slain, his reign of terror brought to a bloody end. Yet the violence does not end there: Cho’s father launches a revenge-driven invasion against Pucheng, only to be met by a counterstrike from Pucheng’s own forces in a pitched field battle. The result is a brutal reversal that underscores the fragile nature of victory in a land where power is constantly contested. With order restored for a time, the film leaves viewers to reflect on the broader social questions it raises: who really holds power, what privileges belong to the upper class, and what constitutes true justice in a landscape where tomorrow’s loyalties can shift with the wind.

Ultimately, the narrative invites a sober meditation on how wealth, status, and military might influence life and death in a fractured society. It asks whether justice can ever be truly impartial when those with resources and influence shape the rules, and it suggests that peace — when it comes — might emerge only after a harsh reckoning of privilege and responsibility. The story does not offer a neat resolution but instead presents a morally complex tapestry in which the line between protector and aggressor is often blurred, and where the cost of keeping a town alive weighs heavily on those who dare to lead.