Attrition 2018

Art & Craft

In terms of direction and cinematography, the film receives mixed feedback. Some reviewers commend occasional striking visual moments and competent camera work, yet most criticize inconsistent editing and bland production design that detract from cohesion. The overall artistic execution is therefore considered below average, reflecting more flaws than strengths.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating acting and character depth, the consensus is largely negative. Critics describe performances as wooden and unconvincing, with Seagal’s portrayal seen as self‑indulgent rather than emotionally resonant. Limited chemistry among the cast further weakens engagement, leading to a character component that fails to support the film effectively.

Story & Flow

The narrative aspect is widely criticized for incoherence and lack of originality. Reviewers point out a nonsensical plot, sluggish pacing, and unresolved sub‑plots that leave the storyline feeling fragmented. Consequently, the story component scores poorly, offering minimal engagement or meaningful progression.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements such as sound design and musical score receive little attention in the critiques, though occasional praise is given to action choreography and specific visual shots. Overall, the audio experience is deemed unremarkable, and the visual style, while occasionally striking, lacks consistency, resulting in a modest sensory rating.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch potential is limited, as most viewers find little incentive beyond occasional camp enjoyment. Some fans cite the film’s absurdity as a source of humor that could merit repeat viewings, yet the majority consider the pacing and plot deficiencies too great for repeated engagement. Overall, the replay value is low.