Skip to content
What's After the Movie?
Biographical documentary

Are We Good? (2025): Cast & Ratings

Are We Good? (2025) movie poster

Are We Good? is a 2025 biographical documentary directed by Steven Feinartz, starring Marc Maron, Lynn Shelton and Conan O'Brien. It runs 1 hour 37 minutes. Critics gave it 97% on Rotten Tomatoes and 69 on Metacritic, and IMDb users rate it 7.2/10.

IMDb rating
7.2/10
Rotten Tomatoes
97%
Echo Score
73
Metascore
69
Loading streaming availability…
Are We Good? (2025) movie poster
Released
Runtime
1h 37m (97 min)
Director
Steven Feinartz
Original language
English
After the credits
No No extra scene
The story

What Is Are We Good? About?

The premise of Are We Good? without spoilers.

Marc Maron, a pioneering comedian and podcaster, confronts the loss of his partner Lynn Shelton, using the grieving process to explore personal growth. While weaving new comedy material, he reflects on his long career, family challenges, and how the comedy landscape has changed as he reaches his sixties.

Loading streaming availability…
Cast & crew

Are We Good? Cast

Marc Maron leads the cast, with Lynn Shelton and Conan O'Brien. Directed by Steven Feinartz; 18 actors are credited in all.

From the director

More from Steven Feinartz

More films directed by Steven Feinartz, best-rated first: The Bitter Buddha, Marc Maron: From Bleak to Dark, Eddie Pepitone: For the Masses and Jessica Kirson: Talking to Myself.

Full filmography
Ratings

Are We Good? Reviews & Ratings

Critics gave Are We Good? 97% on Rotten Tomatoes and 69 on Metacritic, and IMDb users rate it 7.2/10. Our Echo Score gives it 73/100, strongest in rewatch factor (80) and weakest in sensory experience (65).

73 /100

Are We Good? Echo Score Breakdown

Overall, the documentary presents a heartfelt examination of grief and artistic vulnerability, marked by a clear emotional core and engaging storytelling. Critics note its introspective portrait and occasional stylistic restraint, while audience feedback highlights a compelling second‑viewing experience. The mixed but generally favorable consensus reflects solid craftsmanship, resonant character work, and enough novelty to justify repeat watches, though some structural and directorial choices feel uneven.

Our own 0–100 rating, built from five aspects: art, character, story, the sensory experience and how well a film rewatches.

  • Art & Craft 70

    In terms of direction and visual craftsmanship, the film balances thoughtful composition with moments of stylistic restraint. Reviewers commend the director's ability to frame intimate moments, yet some find the approach overly deferential, limiting visual dynamism. The editing maintains a measured rhythm, supporting the narrative without inventive flair. Consequently, the artistic execution is solid but not consistently striking.

  • Character & Emotion 78

    When evaluating character depth, the documentary succeeds in revealing a nuanced, tender side of its subject. Critics highlight the subject's willingness to confront personal loss, creating emotionally resonant moments. Though a few note a lack of raw material from the interviewee, the overall portrayal conveys substantial emotional honesty. The character work therefore leans toward strong, nuanced performance.

  • Story & Flow 72

    The film's narrative arc blends biographical context with an exploration of grief, achieving a measured pace that sustains interest. Critics acknowledge its occasional reliance on conventional structure, describing parts as too deferential, yet also note its ability to transcend typical documentary formulas. Originality emerges through the focus on personal healing, resulting in a story that is mostly compelling despite occasional unevenness.

  • Sensory Experience 65

    Sensory elements, including sound design and visual style, receive limited specific commentary, suggesting a competent but unremarkable execution. The documentary’s auditory landscape supports the emotional tone without standing out, and visual cohesion aligns with the intimate subject matter. While functional and appropriate, the sensory experience does not markedly enhance or detract from the overall impact.

  • Rewatch Factor 80

    Rewatch potential appears strong, with audience remarks emphasizing enjoyment on a second viewing and the film’s lingering emotional resonance. Critics note its soulful conclusion and the way it invites viewers to reflect on grief beyond the initial watch. This lasting appeal, combined with layered emotional content, positions the documentary as one that rewards repeated engagement.

Videos

Are We Good? Trailers & Videos

The trailer of Are We Good?.

Are We Good? | Official Trailer | Utopia
Details

Are We Good? Also Known As

Also known as “我们还好吗?”.

Also known as
  • 我们还好吗?

Seen Are We Good??

FAQ

Are We Good? FAQ: Cast, Runtime & Release Date

Runtime, release date, director, cast, ratings and post-credit scenes of Are We Good?, each answered in a sentence.

How long is Are We Good??

Are We Good? runs 1 hour 37 minutes (97 minutes).

When was Are We Good? released?

Are We Good? was released on October 3, 2025.

Who directed Are We Good??

Are We Good? was directed by Steven Feinartz.

More films by Steven Feinartz

Who is in the cast of Are We Good??

Are We Good? stars Marc Maron, Lynn Shelton and Conan O'Brien, among 18 credited actors.

How is Are We Good? rated?

Are We Good? has 7.2/10 on IMDb, 97% on Rotten Tomatoes, 69 on Metacritic and 45% on TMDB.

Does Are We Good? have a post-credit scene?

No. Are We Good? has no extra scene during or after the credits.

Coming soon to your phone

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

From blockbusters to hidden gems: plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when it launches. Your email stays private, always. Learn more about the app