Vice Is Broke 2025

Art & Craft

In terms of direction and visual craft, the film oscillates between well‑crafted sequences and sections that feel loosely assembled. Reviewers commend the brisk pacing and polished aesthetic, yet also point out a lack of intimacy and occasional superficiality. These mixed observations suggest competent but inconsistent artistic execution, resulting in a score that reflects solid but not outstanding craftsmanship.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character depth and emotional resonance, the documentary succeeds in moments that humanize its subjects, delivering notable intensity. However, some critics describe the portrait as muddled and insufficiently revealing. The balance of nuanced, affective passages against a backdrop of broader, less focused coverage yields a moderate rating that acknowledges both the film's strengths and its limitations in character portrayal.

Story & Flow

The narrative flow shows both measured pacing and instances of meandering, as reviewers cite a chaotic comprehensiveness alongside occasional unnecessary interviews. While the film offers a compelling overview of Vice's rise and fall, its coherence is sometimes compromised by uneven structuring. This blend of effective storytelling and narrative drift results in a mid‑range score for story and flow.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements such as sound design and visual style receive generally positive remarks, with critics noting a punk‑energy polish that supports the documentary’s tone. Though few specific criticisms are offered, the overall impression is that the sensory experience complements the subject matter without dominating it. The modestly high score reflects this favorable but restrained sensory execution.

Rewatch Factor

Regarding rewatch value, the film is deemed essential for those interested in Vice's internal history and praised for its instructive moments. Nonetheless, comments about tedious segments and a lack of sustained engagement suggest limited appeal for repeat viewings. The resulting score captures this moderate replay potential, balancing the documentary’s informative merit with its occasional pacing drawbacks.