Past Malice: An Emma Fielding Mystery 2018

Art & Craft

In terms of visual and technical craft, the production benefits from an attractive location that enhances the atmosphere. Nevertheless, several reviewers cite noticeable technical errors and an editing rhythm that feels slow. The combination of a well‑designed set with uneven execution results in a middling assessment of the film's art and craft.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character work, the leads display moments of likable interaction, particularly in their on‑screen chemistry. Yet many comments highlight stiff acting, questionable casting choices, and a protagonist perceived as overly know‑it‑all. This disparity leads to a slightly below‑average rating for performance and emotional depth.

Story & Flow

The narrative presents a conventional mystery with some historical intrigue, yet suffers from formulaic plotting and pacing issues. Critics point out plot holes, a lack of tension, and a slow‑moving structure that hampers engagement. These shortcomings place the story component on the lower end of the scale.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements such as the scenic backdrop and occasional atmospheric touches are noted positively. The soundtrack and sound design receive little comment, indicating a neutral impact. Overall, the sensory experience contributes modestly to the film’s appeal without standing out.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch potential is divided; some viewers express enthusiasm for future installments and appreciate the light‑hearted tone, while others find the execution weak enough to discourage repeat viewings. This split sentiment results in an average rating for the film’s lasting appeal.