(My) Truth: The Rape of 2 Coreys 2020

Art & Craft

In terms of direction and visual composition, reviewers note nostalgic 80s recreations and a poignant final sequence that enhance the film's atmosphere. Some comment on the high production budget, implying a level of technical competence, though specifics on editing or cinematography are scarce. The consensus reflects a respectable but not outstanding artistic execution, placing the film in the moderate‑to‑positive range.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character portrayal, the audience repeatedly cites the raw, emotionally gripping testimonies and Corey Feldman's personal narrative as central strengths. Viewers describe the stories as heartfelt and resonant, fostering empathy for the victims. Although some doubt Feldman's credibility, the overall emotional impact of the performances is viewed favorably, resulting in a strong character and emotion rating.

Story & Flow

The documentary's narrative receives mixed feedback; many find the subject matter compelling and the arc heartbreaking, yet several point out that much of the content is already public knowledge and that factual inconsistencies undermine cohesion. Critics mention an overemphasis on Corey Haim at the expense of broader context. Consequently, the story is judged as engaging but uneven, landing in the middle of the rating scale.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements such as the nostalgic 80s visual style and the emotive final scene receive positive remarks, indicating effective use of imagery and sound to support the film's tone. However, detailed commentary on soundtrack or sound design is limited, preventing a higher assessment. Overall, the sensory experience is viewed as adequate and somewhat evocative, justifying a slightly above‑average score.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch potential is debated; supporters suggest the film's powerful testimonies and advocacy message warrant repeated viewings, while skeptics argue that credibility doubts diminish its longevity. No explicit endorsements of multiple viewings appear, and the mixed perception of factual integrity curtails enthusiasm for revisiting. This results in a modest rewatch factor, reflecting limited but present interest in subsequent screenings.