Miss Sloane 2016

Elizabeth Sloane, portrayed by Jessica Chastain, emphasizes the essence of lobbying: it’s all about foresight, anticipating your opponent’s strategies, and crafting ingenious countermeasures. During a media-covered hearing, Elizabeth, alongside her lawyer, faces serious allegations of bribery and corruption yet opts to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights, stating, > “Upon the advice of counsel, I must respectfully decline to answer your question.”

As the tale unfolds, we flashback to seven months prior. Elizabeth, engaged in a discussion with her colleague Jane (Alison Pill), expresses concern about the Federal Government’s palm oil tax, which is stripping funds from the people of Indonesia. She craftily suggests that a senator supporting the bill should embark on an all-expenses-paid trip funded by the Indonesian government—a tactic she believes will effectively derail the proposed legislation.

Simultaneously, Elizabeth meets George Dupont (Sam Waterson), the owner of her firm, along with the president of the Gun Lobby, who fearfully addresses the Heaton-Harris Amendment—a bill requiring background checks for gun purchases. They want Elizabeth to be the public face opposing the amendment, leveraging her gender to sway public perception. However, Elizabeth stands firm in her convictions, believing in the necessity of the amendment due to her personal history with gun violence.

Throughout her journey, Elizabeth’s professional relationships evolve. She decides to leave her firm to join Rodolfo Schmidt at Peterson Wyatt. With promises to maintain her team’s current compensation, she sets off on a new path, although not without internal conflict. One team member, Pat Connors, grapples with loyalty to the Gun Lobby and eventually parts ways with her.

Fast forward to the present, where Elizabeth faces scrutiny in court about bribing a senator. Her frustration escalates when Congressperson John Lithgow probes into her personal life, leading her to vehemently defend her medication for insomnia, asserting, “I’m not a drug addict.”

As the narrative unfolds, we witness Elizabeth employing clever tactics to draw attention to the necessity for gun control, even disguising her intentions in a rally. By orchestrating a media strategy, she attempts to highlight the awful consequences of gun violence through poignant television appearances from those affected. Meanwhile, Elizabeth devises a plan to capture the senate vote by planting strategic questions during fundraisers.

However, her innovative approaches reveal cracks in her reputation. When previous associates begin to expose her actions to the media, she becomes embroiled in a scandal driven by the Gun Lobby. Faced with mounting pressure and accusations, Elizabeth’s determination hardens, leading her to refocus her team on strategies in different states.

Eventually, her relentless ambition and capacity for manipulation culminate in a heated televised debate where she stands firm against the onslaught from her rivals, employing sound bites and compelling arguments. Using vivid storytelling, she hopes to humanize the statistics and sway public opinion. Her tenacity sharpens her public persona, but it also complicates her personal life, especially her interactions with Forde, an escort she connects with on multiple levels.

While the tension escalates, Elizabeth learns how to navigate the political landscape with finesse, resorting to surveillance and strategy to expose unethical practices against her. The climax reveals betrayals and unexpected alliances, as Elizabeth’s journey is fraught with moral dilemmas and personal sacrifices.

In a twist, Elizabeth’s backstory with her former colleague Jane adds another layer of complexity. When the dust settles, Elizabeth stands before Congress, openly discussing the immoral tactics used against her while advocating for the truth about the amendment she has pushed so fervently. In the courtroom, she declares, “Lobbying is about foresight,” exhibiting a deft understanding of the political battlefield.

Ultimately, Elizabeth faces the consequences of her actions and the impact of a deeply embedded smear campaign against her. As she enters prison for her misdeeds, she learns about the ripple effect of her campaign. Despite personal losses incurred, the amendment she fought for passes—marking a complicated victory in her relentless quest for justice in gun control legislation. As she leaves prison, the world around her shifts, revealing how much her efforts—though fraught with controversy—have changed the political landscape forever.