Killing for Love 2017

On March 30, 1985, the brutal murders of Derek and Nancy Haysom shocked the small town of Lynchburg, Virginia. Initially investigated by local police, the case eventually drew the attention of the sheriff’s department and the FBI. Fast forward five years to June 21, 1990, when Jens Söring, the boyfriend of the Haysoms’ daughter, Elizabeth Haysom, was convicted of first-degree murder for the deaths of her parents, receiving two life sentences. Concurrently, Elizabeth, deemed an “accessory before the fact,” accepted a plea deal resulting in a staggering 90-year sentence. Exclaiming, >“I’m innocent,” Söring has maintained his claim of innocence ever since.

The investigation reveals dark undercurrents—what truly unfolded that fateful night in Bedford County? A dedicated team, including Jens’s lawyers, former investigator Chuck Reid, and private investigator Dave Watson, works to reassemble the fragmented case. They seek a missing FBI profile while questions arise about nude photographs allegedly depicting child abuse, which may paint Elizabeth in a different light.

In the second episode, when the noose tightens around the couple, they attempt to escape. Arrested in London for check fraud while using false identities, Jens makes a fateful and life-altering decision: to confess to the murders to protect Elizabeth from the electric chair. He believed, being the son of a German diplomat, he would simply serve a brief stint in juvenile detention. This misguided sacrifice sets off a chain of events that would forever alter both of their lives.

As the series progresses, in episode three, Elizabeth returns to the US on August 24, 1987, to testify. Her plea of guilty evokes polarizing opinions—was she a victim of an obsessive relationship or a cunning criminal? Renowned psychiatrists diagnosed her as a borderline schizophrenic and a pathological liar while the revelation dawned on Jens that his father’s diplomatic immunity did not cover him. Facing execution, he recanted his confession.

Subsequent episodes delve deeper into the trials, capturing the tumultuous courtroom scenes where public interest peaked. In episode four, Jens and Elizabeth’s fates intertwine as her testimony builds and undermines their stories. Evaluations of competing alibis and testimony from a forensic expert raise troubling questions about evidence, including a mysterious fingerprint at the crime scene.

In the penultimate episode, belief in Jens’s innocence garners support from various advocates, notably a former state employee who reviews the case and unearths inconsistencies that could exonerate him. As investigators follow new leads, attention turns to unstudied witnesses who could change the narrative entirely.

Finally, in the conclusion, Jens regrets his fateful decisions as he continues to navigate the prison system, haunted by a life sentence imposed in 1990. Years of struggle lead to a possible transfer to Germany, tantalizingly close until a new political decision bars his release. In a twist of fate, post-investigation DNA analysis on the collected evidence reveals that 11 out of 42 samples do not belong to Jens—prompting the haunting question: could the real murderer still be lurking free?