Dawning of the Dead 2017

Art & Craft

In terms of art and craft, the film is described as directionless and plagued by low‑grade cinematography and unconvincing effects. Reviewers repeatedly cite poorly executed visual design, amateur editing, and generic production choices. A single positive note mentions occasional effective set pieces, but this does not offset the overall perception of technical inadequacy. The net impression is that the artistic execution falls short of genre standards.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character and emotion, most critics find the cast generic, with acting described as atrocious and lacking depth. Viewers report no bond with protagonists and criticize underdeveloped personalities. A few comments highlight a strong performance by the lead actress and one supporting actor, yet these are isolated. Overall, the character work is seen as weak and fails to generate audience empathy.

Story & Flow

The story and flow are viewed as predictable and unoriginal, offering few twists and a straightforward narrative that many found boring. Some reviewers acknowledge an inventive outbreak premise and an ambiguous ending that adds modest interest. However, the dominant sentiment is that the plot follows familiar zombie clichés without fresh insight. The cumulative assessment is that the storytelling is mediocre at best.

Sensory Experience

Sensory experience, including sound and visual style, is largely criticized for bad CGI, pixelated effects, and uninspired sound design. Reviewers note that the low budget shows through in ragged visuals and limited practical effects. A handful of comments praise fast‑moving hordes and engaging eating scenes, but these positives are outweighed by the pervasive technical shortcomings. The overall sensory impact is considered weak.

Rewatch Factor

Regarding rewatch factor, the majority of users state they would not return to the film, citing endurance tests and a lack of replay value. Negative remarks dominate, with only a few mentions of enjoyment sufficient to watch through to the end. The consensus suggests the movie offers little incentive for repeat viewings and fails to leave a lasting appeal.