Horror film

Beaten to Death (2023): Cast & Ratings

Name: Beaten to Death
Genre: Horror
Released: 2023-09-01
Duration: 1 h 32 min
Cast: Thomas Roach, Benny Blake, David Curtain, Andy Krambousanos, David Tracy

Beaten to Death is a 2023 horror film directed by Sam Curtain, starring Thomas Roach as Jack, Benny Blake and David Curtain. It runs 1 hour 32 minutes and was made on a reported $500,000 budget. Critics gave it 64% on Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDb users rate it 4.9/10.

IMDb rating: 4.9/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 64%
Echo Score: 48
budget: $500K

Loading streaming availability…

Watch the trailer

Released: September 1, 2023
Runtime: 1h 32m (92 min)
Director: Sam Curtain
Genre: Horror
Original language: English
Studio: Welcome Villain
Budget: $500K
After the credits: No No extra scene

The story

What Is Beaten to Death About?

The premise of Beaten to Death without spoilers.

Following a brutal assault that leaves him for dead, Jack must fight to survive in the harsh wilderness. He encounters dangerous locals and battles the elements as he struggles to confront his mortality and find his way back to civilization. His desperate fight for survival tests his limits and forces him to face his deepest fears.

Loading streaming availability…

Cast & crew

Beaten to Death Cast & Characters

Thomas Roach leads the cast as Jack, with Benny Blake as Scrubs and David Curtain as Jack's Dad. Directed by Sam Curtain; 10 actors are credited in all.

Director Sam Curtain

Thomas Roach as Jack
Benny Blake as Scrubs
David Curtain as Jack's Dad
Andy Krambousanos as Andy

Also Starring in Beaten to Death

· 6 more

From the director

Beaten to Death Reviews & Ratings

Critics gave Beaten to Death 64% on Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDb users rate it 4.9/10. Our Echo Score gives it 48/100, strongest in sensory experience (62) and weakest in story & flow (33).

48 /100

Beaten to Death Echo Score Breakdown

Beaten to Death delivers an unrelenting barrage of graphic violence that will satisfy a narrow segment of extreme‑horror enthusiasts, but its lack of narrative depth and character development limits broader appeal. Critics note a competent, if not innovative, use of cinematography and production design, yet many find the visual excess exhausting rather than artistic. The film’s polarizing nature results in a mixed reception, situating it in the lower‑mid range of overall quality.

Our own 0–100 rating, built from five aspects: art, character, story, the sensory experience and how well a film rewatches.

Art & Craft 58

In terms of art and craft, the film shows moments of competent construction, with a clear visual style that emphasizes gritty realism. Some reviewers praise the effective use of practical effects and a steady hand in framing brutal sequences. However, others criticize the reliance on gore over nuanced composition, describing the execution as tediously gratuitous. Overall, its technical competence is offset by a lack of artistic subtlety.
Character & Emotion 40

When it comes to character and emotion, the movie offers limited depth, with many viewers describing the protagonists as empty vessels for violence. A few critics acknowledge realistic performances that convey fear, yet the consensus is that character motivations are thin and dialogue scarce. The absence of compelling arcs diminishes emotional resonance, resulting in a largely unsatisfying character landscape.
Story & Flow 33

Regarding story and flow, the narrative is widely regarded as thin and underdeveloped. Reviewers point to a lack of coherent plot, vague motivations, and a pacing that prioritizes shock over storytelling. While the film maintains relentless momentum, the scarcity of substantive plot points leaves viewers feeling unengaged. Consequently, the story aspect receives the lowest assessment.
Sensory Experience 62

In the sensory experience domain, the film excels at delivering visceral impact through graphic gore and an unflinching sound design. Critics commend the brutal aesthetic and its capacity to provoke strong physical reactions. Nonetheless, some describe the sensory overload as exhausting rather than immersive. The overall sensory impression is intense and effective for its intended audience, yielding a relatively high score.
Rewatch Factor 45

Assessing rewatch factor, the movie appeals primarily to viewers who seek extreme horror as a singular experience. While a subset of fans find it worth revisiting for its unapologetic brutality, most cite the lack of narrative and character variety as deterrents to repeat viewings. The limited replay value places the rewatch score in the lower‑mid range.