What's After the Blog?
Opinions • Reception
Dreams (2025) Review & Reception: Critics and Fans Share Opinions on This Poignant Coming-of-Age Drama
Explore how critics and audiences responded to Dreams (2025), examining performances, storytelling, and the film's emotional impact. We break down fan reactions, critic reviews, and the movie's place in contemporary coming-of-age cinema.
August 29, 2025
Welcome to the most comprehensive look at how critics and movie‑goers are responding to Michel Franco’s provocative new drama Dreams (2025). Below you’ll find a deep dive into the most interesting quotes, a side‑by‑side comparison of praise and criticism, and a look at what the audience is saying on Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic and beyond. All of this is powered by the data and tools you love on What’s After the Movie – from plot summaries to detailed box‑office stats, award histories, and even fun quizzes and games.
Across the major print and online publications, Dreams lands somewhere in the middle of the critical spectrum, earning a Metacritic average of 71. The film’s intimate voice‑over and dream‑like visual language are repeatedly praised, while its narrative shift in the second half draws a sharper divide.
“At its best, Dreams is intimate and contemplative, anchored by Overbye’s dreamy voice‑over and performance.” – The Irish Times
The Irish Times highlights the film’s opening act, noting a lyrical quality that draws viewers into a “cascading specifics of texture and emotional coloration”—a phrase lifted directly from The New Yorker:
“The film’s precise juxtapositions of sight and sound produce brilliant flashes of insight, cascading specifics of texture and emotional coloration, and a cumulatively seductive, almost musical flow.” – The New Yorker
Both publications agree the first half feels like a carefully crafted art piece, a sentiment echoed by The Guardian, which adds a dry comedy angle:
“This is an amiably talky film…there is much dry comedy to be enjoyed.” – The Guardian
However, the critics converge on a shared disappointment with the film’s latter half. The Irish Times bluntly states, “The second half loses some of that purpose.” Screen Rant points out that while the dramatic devices are strong, they “pair well with its interests” only when the story remains focused.
All told, the consensus is that Dreams excels when it leans into its visual‑poetic ambitions, but stumbles when the narrative tries to broaden its thematic scope. For a full breakdown of the film’s production details, head over to the Dreams movie page on What’s After the Movie.
When the film hits the right notes, reviewers are effusive. The New Yorker lauds the “almost musical flow” that makes the viewing experience feel like a “seductive symphony of sight and sound.” The publication’s appreciation for Franco’s structural daring underscores a broader admiration for the director’s willingness to blend psychosexual drama with social commentary.
Rene Sanchez of Cine Sin Fronteras (writing in Spanish) hails Jessica Chastain’s performance as “outstanding,” emphasizing how her presence elevates the film’s exploration of “privilege, power and desire.” The review adds:
“Franco’s nuanced subtext turns a simple immigration story into a vivid tapestry of human longing.”
Dennis Schwartz goes further, calling the film a “pulverizing immigration relationship film” that forces viewers to confront uncomfortable power dynamics. Similarly, Matthew Turner from Next Best Picture celebrates the “powerfully intense erotic drama” that “exposes its central character’s exploitation of both the wealth gap and the age gap to devastating effect.”
Even Screen Rant, while balanced, notes that the dramatic devices—particularly the voice‑over narration and visual motifs—“pair well with its interests,” suggesting the film’s formal choices successfully reinforce its thematic core.
These positive appraisals converge on three key strengths:
If you want to explore the film’s key moments in detail, check out the movie wiki on What’s After the Movie, which breaks down every scene with timestamps and analysis.
While many celebrate Dreams for its artistic bravado, a sizable faction of reviewers find the film’s execution “vague” and “over‑obvious.” Grant Watson (Fiction Machine) delivers a succinct rant:
“The conclusion leaves an ugly taste in the mouth: why that change in direction? What was the ultimate point of this film?”
Watson’s frustration mirrors Nadine Whitney (InSession Film), who describes the film as “vacillating between too obvious and too ugly,” and accuses it of tangling itself in an “uninteresting psychodrama between the vampiric rich and the talented ‘unfortunates.’”
Emma Kiely of Collider takes it a step further, calling the first two acts “flat,” with “stiff dialogue” and “rushed editing.” Yet she concedes that Franco’s “thematic subtext is extremely nuanced and vivid,” highlighting a paradox where the film’s ideas outshine its execution.
Marshall Shaffer (The Playlist) dismisses the movie as an “obvious parable about immigration with little to offer beyond spitefulness.” Meanwhile, Slant Magazine’s low score (38) points to the film’s “blunt obviousness” as a barrier to meaningful engagement.
Collectively, these critiques focus on three recurring problems:
If you want to read more about the film’s cast and crew, the person profiles on What’s After the Movie provide bios, filmographies, and interview excerpts.
User scores on Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic paint a more nuanced picture. While critics average around 71, audience members on Rotten Tomatoes have given Dreams a 62% “Fresh” rating, reflecting a split reaction that mirrors the critical divide.
Many viewers laud Chastain’s performance and the film’s “haunting atmosphere,” echoing the positive press. However, a substantial portion of the audience complains about the “confusing second act” and “slow pacing,” echoing the negative critics cited above.
The JustWatch data indicates a moderate streaming uptake, suggesting that viewers who are drawn to art‑house cinema are willing to give the film a chance, while casual movie‑goers tend to skip it after reading mixed reviews.
This alignment between critic and audience sentiment reinforces the idea that Dreams is a polarizing work—highly rewarding for those who appreciate its formal ambition, but potentially frustrating for viewers seeking a tighter narrative.
For a quick glance at the film’s box‑office performance and streaming availability, visit our box‑office hub and JustWatch link.
If you’ve made it this far, you already know that Dreams sparks lively debate. At What’s After the Movie we give you the tools to dig deeper:
All of these resources are linked directly from the Dreams movie page, so you can flip between reviews, data, and fan content without ever leaving the site.
| Site | Link |
|---|---|
| IMDb | IMDb |
| TMDB | The Movie Database (TMDB) |
| Rotten Tomatoes | Rotten Tomatoes |
| Metacritic | Metacritic |
| JustWatch | JustWatch |
| Box Office Mojo | Box Office Mojo |
What's After the Movie?
Not sure whether to stay after the credits? Find out!
Explore Our Movie Platform
New Movie Releases (2025)
Famous Movie Actors
Top Film Production Studios
Movie Plot Summaries & Endings
Major Movie Awards & Winners
Best Concert Films & Music Documentaries
Movie Collections and Curated Lists
© 2025 What's After the Movie. All rights reserved.