Logo What's After the Movie

Test your knowledge of Marshall with our quiz!

Plot Summary

Read the complete plot summary and ending explained for Marshall (2017). From turning points to emotional moments, uncover what really happened and why it matters.


In April 1941, Thurgood Marshall, played by Chadwick Boseman, serves as an impassioned attorney for the NAACP, embarking on a mission to defend individuals of color who face unjust accusations due to rampant racial bias. Upon returning to his office in New York City, he is swiftly dispatched to Bridgeport, Connecticut. Here, he is tasked with the defense of Joseph Spell, portrayed by Sterling K. Brown, a chauffeur accused of raping his white employer, Eleanor Strubing, played by Kate Hudson. This sensational case has captured the attention of the media, amplifying the stakes involved.

In Bridgeport, Marshall encounters Sam Friedman, played by Josh Gad, who is reluctantly assigned by his brother to assist in securing Marshall’s admission to the local bar. The situation is complicated when Judge Foster, played by James Cromwell, a friend of the prosecutor Lorin Willis portrayed by Dan Stevens, grudgingly allows Marshall to represent Spell but with a strict limitation—Marshall cannot speak during the trial. As a result, Friedman must take the lead in defending Spell, relying heavily on Marshall’s guidance through notes and advice. One key piece of Marshall’s counsel is allowing a strong-willed Southern white woman onto the jury, whose assertiveness might be beneficial for their case.

Throughout the trial, Spell maintains his innocence, claiming he never engaged in any sexual activity with Strubing. He leads Marshall and Friedman to a patrolman who encountered him while he was driving Strubing’s vehicle the night in question. Together, they investigate the inconsistencies in Strubing’s allegations that Spell had tied her up in the back seat of her car after committing rape and attempted to dispose of her body at a bridge. The defense team is perplexed by why Spell purportedly would the throw her into the calm waters rather than the rapids.

Initially, Spell considers a plea deal presented by Willis, yet Marshall persuades him to refuse. During the trial, however, a doctor’s testimony reveals crucial evidence—skin fragments found under Strubing’s fingernails and contusions on her body. In a dramatic turn, Strubing herself asserts in court that she was bound in the backseat when the police officer apprehended Spell. This startling revelation compels Marshall and Friedman to press Spell for the truth, which ultimately leads him to admit that he lied about their encounter.

Spell’s testimony unveils a tragic backstory; he explains that Strubing’s husband was the source of her bruises caused by ongoing abuse. On that fateful night, when Spell sought financial help from Strubing, she was distressed and consented to have sex with him. However, upon realizing the implications of her actions, Strubing panicked, leading to a series of events where she attempted to end her life after falsely accusing Spell of rape. In this tense courtroom drama, Spell reveals the harrowing truth: black men in Louisiana often face brutal consequences for relationships with white women, which compounds his fear of being accused.

Despite Judge Foster’s visible discomfort and the shocked reactions of the jury members, he permits Spell’s testimony to remain, adding a new layer of tension as they await the outcome. Before the verdict is announced, Marshall must depart for a case in Mississippi, leaving Friedman to navigate the final stages of the trial alone. Embracing newfound confidence, Spell dismisses an alternative plea bargain offered by Willis.

The following day, Marshall and Friedman finalize the closing arguments, which Friedman must subsequently present solo. Encouragingly, the jury is led by a Southern white woman, who ultimately delivers a shocking “not guilty” verdict. The courtroom erupts in applause, propelling Spell into a state of happiness and relief. Over the phone, Friedman shares the jubilant news with Marshall, who is preparing for his next legal battle.

As the closing credits roll, we learn that Friedman continued his vital work in numerous civil rights cases, and Marshall’s legacy grows as he becomes a pivotal figure in the American Civil Rights Movement, later achieving the distinction of being the first African American Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

Timeline

Follow the complete movie timeline of Marshall (2017) with every major event in chronological order. Great for understanding complex plots and story progression.


Thurgood Marshall's Mission

In April 1941, Thurgood Marshall, a dedicated NAACP lawyer, is traveling across the country to defend individuals of color who have been wrongly accused of crimes due to racial bias. His commitment to justice highlights the systemic issues faced by African Americans in the legal sphere.

April 1941

The Case of Joseph Spell

Upon returning to his office in New York City, Marshall is sent to Bridgeport, Connecticut, to defend Joseph Spell, a chauffeur falsely accused of raping his white employer, Eleanor Strubing. This case has attracted significant media attention due to its racially charged nature.

Bridgeport, Connecticut

Admittance to the Bar

In Bridgeport, insurance lawyer Sam Friedman is reluctantly tasked to help Marshall get admitted to the local bar, a requirement for him to defend Spell during the trial. Despite facing opposition from the judge, Friedman works to secure Marshall’s presence in the courtroom.

Bridgeport, Connecticut

Trial Preparations Begin

Judge Foster allows Marshall to practice law in his court but forbids him from speaking during the trial. This decision places immense pressure on Friedman as he must navigate the complex trial aided only by Marshall's guidance through notes.

Spell's Claim

Joseph Spell asserts to Marshall that he never had any sexual contact with Eleanor Strubing. He directs the lawyers to a police patrolman who stopped him that night while he was with Strubing, hoping this testimony will support his innocence.

Investigating the Accusation

Marshall and Friedman investigate Strubing's account, questioning the credibility of her claim that Spell assaulted her in the back seat of her car. Their doubts grow as they analyze the inconsistencies, specifically why Spell would attempt to throw her into a calmer part of the river.

Bridgeport, Connecticut

Confronting the Evidence

During the trial, a doctor reveals that skin was found under Strubing's fingernails along with bruises on her body, suggesting a struggle. Strubing's testimony of being tied up when police arrived strengthens the prosecution’s case against Spell.

Spell's Confession

Under pressure from Marshall and Friedman, Spell confesses that he had sexual encounters with Strubing. He explains that the bruises could be attributed to her abusive husband, leading to a convoluted series of events that paint a much more complicated picture.

The Distraught Strubing

Spell recounts a night where Strubing, panicked over a potential pregnancy, jumped from a bridge while he tried to stop her. This moment highlights the volatile circumstances surrounding the situation and Strubing's emotional state.

Bridgeport, Connecticut

A Surprising Jury Dynamics

As the trial progresses, a Southern white woman is selected as the jury forewoman, which plays a crucial role in the trial's outcome. Her assertive nature raises hopes for a fair deliberation among the jurors.

Marshall's Departure

Before the verdict is delivered, Marshall is called away to handle another case in Mississippi. As he leaves, the tensions of the trial weigh heavily on both him and Spell, with fate hanging in the balance.

Final Plea Bargain

In Marshall's absence, prosecutor Willis offers Spell a lighter plea agreement, but emboldened by the revelations in court, Spell refuses to accept it. This decision marks a turning point in his confidence regarding the trial.

The Closing Arguments

With Marshall gone, Friedman presents the closing statement on behalf of Spell. Their earlier preparation comes into play as they hope that their defense resonates with the jury during this critical moment.

The Verdict

The jury ultimately delivers a 'not guilty' verdict, much to the surprise and relief of Spell and his defense team. The verdict highlights a significant victory not only for Spell but for justice in a racially charged environment.

Bridgeport, Connecticut

Moving Forward

After the trial, Joseph Spell is filled with joy as the jury celebrates the verdict. Both Marshall and Friedman reflect on their commitment to civil rights, with Marshall continuing his illustrious career in the American legal system.

Characters

Explore all characters from Marshall (2017). Get detailed profiles with their roles, arcs, and key relationships explained.


Thurgood Marshall (Chadwick Boseman)

Thurgood Marshall is a fearless NAACP lawyer dedicated to fighting racial injustice and defending wrongly accused individuals. His sharp intellect and unwavering commitment to equality make him a formidable presence in the courtroom. Marshall's profound understanding of the law, coupled with his personal experiences, drive him to challenge the systemic injustices of his time.

⚖️ Lawyer ✊ Civil Rights 💪 Determined

Joseph Spell (Sterling K. Brown)

Joseph Spell is a chauffeur wrongfully accused of rape, whose plight serves as the central focus of the trial. Initially fearful and confused, he represents the struggles faced by African Americans in a prejudiced legal system. As the story unfolds, Spell finds his voice and courage to confront his fears, ultimately revealing the truth about his circumstances.

🚗 Chauffeur 😔 Wrongly Accused 🔍 Searching for Truth

Eleanor Strubing (Kate Hudson)

Eleanor Strubing is the white employer who accuses Joseph Spell of rape, serving as a catalyst for the central conflict in the film. Her character embodies the societal prejudices of the time, and her actions lead to a pivotal trial that exposes the racial dynamics at play. Eleanor's fear and desperation ultimately shape the legal battle that unfolds.

👩‍💼 Accuser ⚡ Tension 🎭 Complexity

Sam Friedman (Josh Gad)

Sam Friedman is an insurance lawyer reluctantly drawn into a highly charged racial trial. Initially lacking confidence, he grows under Marshall's mentorship, representing a bridge between different racial experiences. Friedman's evolution underscores the importance of standing up against injustice and learning to advocate for what is right.

📚 Lawyer 🤷‍♂️ Reluctant 🦸‍♂️ Evolving

Judge Foster (James Cromwell)

Judge Foster is a key judicial figure in the trial, balancing his personal biases with the demands of justice. His character reflects the complexities of the legal system during a racially charged atmosphere. Though he has affiliations that could cloud his judgement, his ultimate decisions impact the outcome of the trial significantly.

⚖️ Authority ⚖️ Judicial ⚠️ Biased

Setting

Learn where and when Marshall (2017) takes place. Explore the film’s settings, era, and how they shape the narrative.


Time period

April 1941

The film is set during a critical time in American history, just before the United States' entry into World War II. This period is characterized by significant racial tensions, with the Civil Rights Movement beginning to take shape. The legal battles fought during this time were pivotal in laying the groundwork for future advancements in civil rights.

Location

New York City, Bridgeport, Connecticut

The movie primarily takes place in New York City and Bridgeport, Connecticut. New York City serves as the hub of Thurgood Marshall's legal work, representing a vibrant and tumultuous environment for social justice. Bridgeport, Connecticut, becomes the focal point of a racially charged court case that highlights the deep-seated prejudices of the time.

🌆 City ⚖️ Courtroom

Themes

Discover the main themes in Marshall (2017). Analyze the deeper meanings, emotional layers, and social commentary behind the film.


⚖️

Justice

The theme of justice is central to 'Marshall', exploring the struggles against racial prejudice in the legal system. Thurgood Marshall's fight for Joseph Spell underscores the importance of fairness and truth in a flawed judicial process. It highlights the courage required to confront systemic injustice and the relentless pursuit of equality.

💔

Prejudice

Prejudice plays a crucial role in the narrative, reflecting the societal biases that affect the characters' lives. Joseph Spell's wrongful accusation stems from deep-rooted racial stereotypes and fears, illustrating the devastating impact of racial injustices. The film sheds light on how these biases shape the lives of those involved, ultimately pushing the characters toward a fight for dignity.

🤝

Collaboration

Collaboration between Marshall and Friedman signifies the theme of unity against a common goal. Their partnership demonstrates how individuals from different backgrounds can come together to challenge injustices. It emphasizes the importance of support and collaboration in the pursuit of justice, particularly in a racially divided society.

Movies with Similar Twists and Themes

Uncover films that echo the narrative beats, emotional arcs, or dramatic twists of the one you're exploring. These recommendations are handpicked based on story depth, thematic resonance, and spoiler-worthy moments — perfect for fans who crave more of the same intrigue.


© 2025 What's After the Movie. All rights reserved.