Time Jumpers 2018

Art & Craft

Regarding art and craft, reviewers repeatedly note subpar direction and uneven editing, with few remarks on visual execution. The third segment is singled out for its effective visual storytelling, yet this isolated success does not compensate for the overall lack of coherent cinematography or production design across the anthology. The artistic elements therefore receive a low assessment.

Character & Emotion

In terms of character and emotion, acting is frequently described as terrible or merely passable, with criticism aimed at flat performances and lack of depth. A minority of reviewers acknowledge moments of competent acting, particularly in the first and third shorts, but these instances are outweighed by pervasive negative sentiment. Consequently, the character work earns a below‑average score.

Story & Flow

The anthology’s story and flow are considered its weakest component; reviewers condemn the lack of connection between segments, absent endings, and repetitive time‑travel tropes. Pacing is described as erratic, with some shorts labeled predictable while others are deemed incomprehensible. Despite isolated appreciation for one segment’s narrative clarity, the overall plot coherence remains severely deficient.

Sensory Experience

Sensory experience receives limited commentary; a few reviewers praise visual storytelling in the third short, while sound design and music are largely unmentioned. The overall impression is one of minimal sensory impact, with the anthology failing to deliver a distinctive auditory or stylistic identity. This results in a modestly low sensory score.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch factor is overwhelmingly low; the majority advise avoiding the film, citing its disjointed structure and lack of satisfying conclusions. A single positive voice suggests it might appeal to niche viewers who appreciate fragmented storytelling, yet this perspective is an outlier. Consequently, the film offers little incentive for repeat viewings.