Sharks of the Corn (2021): Cast & Ratings
Sharks of the Corn is a 2021 comedy horror film starring Tim Ritter as Clint Grossman, Todd Martin and Rebecca Rinehart. It runs 1 hour 45 minutes. Its Echo Score is 12/100.
- Released
- Runtime
- 1h 45m (105 min)
- Original language
-
English
- Studio
- SRS Cinema
- After the credits
- No No extra scene
What Is Sharks of the Corn About?
The premise of Sharks of the Corn without spoilers.
Strange and unsettling events plague the small town of Druid Hills, Kentucky, a region known for its vast cornfields. Residents discover a terrifying phenomenon as victims are found in the corn, and reports surface of massive Great White sharks inexplicably swimming amongst the corn stalks. The community is gripped by fear as they try to understand the bizarre and deadly threat lurking within the seemingly innocent landscape.
Sharks of the Corn Themes & Keywords
· 6 tags- sharksploitation
- children of the corn
- corn
- shark
- shark attack
- shark feature
Sharks of the Corn Cast & Characters
Tim Ritter leads the cast as Clint Grossman, with Todd Martin as Mayor Zanuck and Rebecca Rinehart as Susan.
- Tim Ritter as Clint Grossman
- Todd Martin as Mayor Zanuck
- Rebecca Rinehart as Susan
- Steven Guynn as Teddy Bo Lucas
Also Starring in Sharks of the Corn
· 15 more- Ford Windstar Jonathan Gottlieb
- Mason Roberts Clubber Joe / Bigfoot
- Katrina Joan / Cornfield Victim
- Billy W. Blackwell Angel
- Thomas Kindler Mr. Mello
- Trish Erickson-Martin Rosenberg
- Heather Hall Barbara
- Jason Boyd Gary / Bigfoot / Soldier
- Shannon Stockin Shark Goddess / Scheider / Lorna
- Casey Miracle Benchley
- Cherokee Hall Ray
- Lee Hall Billy
- Al Nicolosi Kramer
- Amanda C. Healy Joey
- Zoey Bush Biff
Sharks of the Corn Reviews & Ratings
Our Echo Score gives it 12/100, strongest in character & emotion (20) and weakest in sensory experience (15).
Sharks of the Corn Echo Score Breakdown
Sharks of the Corn delivers an overwhelmingly sub‑par viewing experience, with deficiencies across virtually every cinematic dimension. The film’s technical execution suffers from amateurish direction, jarring editing, and visibly low‑budget effects, while performances remain flat and unconvincing. Narrative coherence is further undermined by a contrived premise and uneven pacing that fails to engage. Sensory elements, including sound design and visual composition, offer little compensation, resulting in minimal rewatch appeal. In sum, the movie falls far short of basic genre standards.
Our own 0–100 rating, built from five aspects: art, character, story, the sensory experience and how well a film rewatches.
- Art & Craft 15
In terms of art and craft, the film exhibits rudimentary direction and poorly composed cinematography. Editing is inconsistent, resulting in jarring cuts that disrupt narrative flow. Production design relies on visibly cheap practical effects, most notably a hand‑held shark prop that betrays its low budget. Overall, technical execution lacks polish, contributing to a disjointed visual presentation.
- Character & Emotion 20
When evaluating character and emotion, performances are notably flat, with lead actors delivering unconvincing dialogue and limited emotional range. Character depth is shallow, offering minimal development beyond the film’s outlandish premise. Interactions lack chemistry, and the intended humor fails to materialize, leaving audiences disengaged from the protagonists.
- Story & Flow 15
The story suffers from a contrived premise that mixes sharks with cornfields without clear motivation, resulting in a narrative that feels both absurd and directionless. Pacing is uneven, with excessive exposition followed by prolonged, uneventful sequences, and the plot offers little originality or coherent progression, undermining overall engagement.
- Sensory Experience 15
Sensory experience is hindered by low‑fidelity sound design, with music and effects that lack cohesion and often drown dialogue. Visual style is inconsistent; lighting appears flat and composition is frequently off‑center, while the special‑effects work appears visibly artificial. Consequently, the film fails to create an immersive or aesthetically satisfying atmosphere.
- Rewatch Factor 20
The film offers minimal rewatch value; its shortcomings in narrative coherence, performance, and technical execution provide little incentive for repeat viewings. While a small subset of viewers might find inadvertent amusement in its obvious flaws, the overall experience remains tedious and unsatisfying, leading most audiences to discard it after a single watch.
Sharks of the Corn Trailers & Videos
The trailer of Sharks of the Corn.
Cars in Sharks of the Corn
9 cars on screen, including the 2000 Chevrolet Malibu and the 2020 Dodge Charger.
-
2000 Chevrolet Malibu Important role -
2020 Dodge Charger Important role -
2019 Ford Fusion Important role -
2004 Lexus RX Important role
Seen Sharks of the Corn?
Movies Like Sharks of the Corn
Films with a similar story, tone or audience, including Shark Swarm, Shark Warning and The Last Shark.
Sharks of the Corn FAQ: Cast, Runtime & Release Date
Runtime, release date, cast and post-credit scenes of Sharks of the Corn, each answered in a sentence.
How long is Sharks of the Corn?
Sharks of the Corn runs 1 hour 45 minutes (105 minutes).
When was Sharks of the Corn released?
Sharks of the Corn was released on February 25, 2021.
Who is in the cast of Sharks of the Corn?
Sharks of the Corn stars Tim Ritter as Clint Grossman, Todd Martin as Mayor Zanuck and Rebecca Rinehart as Susan, among 19 credited actors.
Does Sharks of the Corn have a post-credit scene?
No. Sharks of the Corn has no extra scene during or after the credits.
Coming soon to your phone
The Plot Explained Movie Summary App
From blockbusters to hidden gems: plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Save your favorites and never miss a twist again.
Be the first to know when it launches. Your email stays private, always. Learn more about the app
