Skip to content
What's After the Movie?
Horror film

Return of the Tooth Fairy (2020): Cast & Ratings

Return of the Tooth Fairy (2020) movie poster

Return of the Tooth Fairy is a 2020 horror film directed by Louisa Warren, starring Jake Watkins as Corey, Chelsea Greenwood and Simon Manley. It runs 1 hour 31 minutes. Its Echo Score is 18/100.

Loading streaming availability…
Return of the Tooth Fairy (2020) movie poster
Released
Runtime
1h 31m (91 min)
Director
Louisa Warren
Genre
Horror
Original language
English
After the credits
No No extra scene
The story

What Is Return of the Tooth Fairy About?

The premise of Return of the Tooth Fairy without spoilers.

Fifteen years after the initial encounter, Corey returns to his class reunion, still affected by his childhood experiences with the Tooth Fairy. However, the fairy has returned, and Corey discovers that the consequences of neglecting dental hygiene can be far more serious than he ever imagined. This time, proper dental care is essential to avoid unforeseen and magical repercussions.

Return of the Tooth Fairy Themes & Keywords

· 1 tag
  • title directed by female
Loading streaming availability…
Cast & crew

Return of the Tooth Fairy Cast & Characters

Jake Watkins leads the cast as Corey, with Chelsea Greenwood as Jo and Simon Manley as Ray. Directed by Louisa Warren; 14 actors are credited in all.

Also Starring in Return of the Tooth Fairy

· 10 more
From the director

More from Louisa Warren

More films directed by Louisa Warren, best-rated first: Cinderella’s Curse, Ouija Castle, Pigman and Legend of the Lizard Man.

Full filmography
Ratings

Return of the Tooth Fairy Reviews & Ratings

Our Echo Score gives it 18/100, strongest in story & flow (30) and weakest in art & craft (12).

18 /100

Return of the Tooth Fairy Echo Score Breakdown

Return of the Tooth Fairy is overwhelmingly regarded as a poorly executed horror sequel. Reviewers consistently condemn the amateurish production values, weak performances, and incoherent plot, labeling it a painful viewing experience. A few isolated comments note modest improvements over the original and occasional effective scares, but these are far outweighed by the numerous criticisms. Consequently, the film lacks appeal and offers minimal incentive for repeat viewings.

Our own 0–100 rating, built from five aspects: art, character, story, the sensory experience and how well a film rewatches.

  • Art & Craft 12

    In terms of art and craft, the film is described as a low‑budget, home‑video effort with consistently bad camera work, lighting, and special effects. Reviewers compare the visuals to a junior‑high project and highlight poorly executed makeup and set design. No positive remarks about direction or editing are offered, resulting in a markedly low appraisal of the technical execution.

  • Character & Emotion 15

    When evaluating character and emotion, critics note unconvincing acting, flat performances, and lack of chemistry among the cast. The main protagonist receives a brief mention as “cute,” but overall the portrayals are deemed pitiful and amateur. Even the few reviewers who acknowledge minor character motivations still criticize the general acting quality, leading to a weak score for this aspect.

  • Story & Flow 30

    The story and flow receive mixed feedback. Many reviewers find the plot incoherent, citing an implausible school‑reunion premise and sluggish pacing. However, some acknowledge a modestly interesting premise involving a traumatized individual and a supernatural threat, describing it as an improvement over the original. The balance of negative and limited positive observations places this aspect in the lower‑mid range.

  • Sensory Experience 20

    Sensory experience is heavily criticized for poor sound design, pervasive background noise, and inconsistent audio levels. Visual style suffers from washed‑out lighting and cheap effects, with reviewers likening it to a child’s costume. While a few note occasional eerie moments, the dominant view is that the auditory and visual components detract significantly from the viewing experience.

  • Rewatch Factor 15

    Rewatch factor is uniformly low, with most reviewers advising against future viewings and describing the film as a waste of time. Only a single comment hints at modest enjoyment, but the prevailing sentiment is that the movie lacks lasting appeal or entertainment value, resulting in a minimal score for repeatability.

Details

Return of the Tooth Fairy Also Known As

8 alternative titles, including “Toothfairy 2” and “Toothfairy: Root of Evil”.

Also known as
  • Toothfairy 2
  • Toothfairy: Root of Evil
  • Зубная фея 2, კბილის ფერიას დაბრუნება
  • Hada de los Dientes: La Última Extracción
  • Fada do Dente 2: A Raíz do Mal
  • Die Zahnfee 2 - Die Wurzel des Bösen
  • 索命牙仙2
  • Повернення Зубної феї

Seen Return of the Tooth Fairy?

FAQ

Return of the Tooth Fairy FAQ: Cast & Runtime

Runtime, release date, director, cast and post-credit scenes of Return of the Tooth Fairy, each answered in a sentence.

How long is Return of the Tooth Fairy?

Return of the Tooth Fairy runs 1 hour 31 minutes (91 minutes).

When was Return of the Tooth Fairy released?

Return of the Tooth Fairy was released on June 15, 2020.

Who directed Return of the Tooth Fairy?

Return of the Tooth Fairy was directed by Louisa Warren.

More films by Louisa Warren

Who is in the cast of Return of the Tooth Fairy?

Return of the Tooth Fairy stars Jake Watkins as Corey, Chelsea Greenwood as Jo and Simon Manley as Ray, among 14 credited actors.

Does Return of the Tooth Fairy have a post-credit scene?

No. Return of the Tooth Fairy has no extra scene during or after the credits.

Coming soon to your phone

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

From blockbusters to hidden gems: plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when it launches. Your email stays private, always. Learn more about the app