Skip to content
What's After the Movie?
Horror film

C.O.R.N. (2021): Cast & Ratings

C.O.R.N. (2021) movie poster

C.O.R.N. is a 2021 horror film directed by Robin Christian, starring Robert Donavan as Mr. Dr., Roger Cross and Kennedy Tucker. It runs 1 hour 42 minutes and was made on a reported $950,000 budget. Its Echo Score is 33/100.

Echo Score
33
budget
$950K
C.O.R.N. (2021) movie poster
Released
Runtime
1h 42m (102 min)
Director
Robin Christian
Genre
Horror
Original language
English
Budget
$950K
After the credits
No No extra scene
The story

What Is C.O.R.N. About?

The premise of C.O.R.N. without spoilers.

While visiting a rural area, two teenagers find themselves stranded on Halloween. They encounter friendly locals, but their welcome turns unsettling when they discover a sinister cult known as C.O.R.N. (Collective Order of Recreational Necrophilanthropists). This group has chosen the area for a disturbing practice: human taxidermy, and the teens must confront the horrifying truth behind the seemingly idyllic community.

C.O.R.N. Themes & Keywords

· 18 tags
  • cult
  • cornfield
  • halloween
  • corn maze
  • silo
  • scarecrow
  • halloween party
  • halloween costume
  • thor costume
  • hayride
  • throat slit
  • party
+6 more
  • farm
  • taxidermy
  • bee costume
  • fire
  • friend
  • big cleavage
Cast & crew

C.O.R.N. Cast & Characters

Robert Donavan leads the cast as Mr. Dr., with Roger Cross as Don and Kennedy Tucker as Tia. Directed by Robin Christian; 18 actors are credited in all.

Ratings

C.O.R.N. Reviews & Ratings

Our Echo Score gives it 33/100, strongest in story & flow (48) and weakest in art & craft (20).

33 /100

C.O.R.N. Echo Score Breakdown

C.O.R.N. presents a largely ineffective cinematic experience, with pervasive shortcomings across its core elements. The direction and visual execution are widely described as amateurish, while performances are frequently labeled as poor, despite isolated pockets of acceptable acting. Narrative structure suffers from incoherence and uneven pacing, offering limited originality. Sensory components such as sound and visual style receive minimal praise, and the film's lasting appeal is minimal, appealing only to a niche segment of B‑horror enthusiasts.

Our own 0–100 rating, built from five aspects: art, character, story, the sensory experience and how well a film rewatches.

  • Art & Craft 20

    In terms of direction and visual craftsmanship, reviewers consistently highlight amateurish execution and poorly filmed sequences. Comments describe the directing as comparable to work by very young creators, and the cinematography as substandard throughout. Editing choices are noted as disjointed, contributing to a fragmented viewing experience. The collective assessment suggests a markedly low level of artistic competence.

  • Character & Emotion 40

    When assessing acting and character depth, the majority of feedback points to weak performances and unconvincing portrayals. Numerous reviewers label the acting as terrible or god‑awful, though a few acknowledge occasional decent or enjoyable performances. Emotional resonance is largely absent, and chemistry between characters is not highlighted positively. Overall, character work falls on the lower end of the scale.

  • Story & Flow 48

    The film's narrative receives mixed reactions; some note an original premise and a solid plot idea, yet most describe the story as chaotic and poorly paced. Reviewers mention abrupt tonal shifts, overly talkative villains, and a lack of cohesive structure, resulting in a disengaging experience. While occasional moments of humor are praised, the overall storytelling is judged as uneven and underdeveloped.

  • Sensory Experience 30

    Sensory elements such as visual style and sound design are predominately criticized for low production quality. Observations include poorly filmed scenes, ineffective effects, and an overall lack of atmospheric depth. A modest compliment is offered for occasional gore, yet it does not compensate for the broader sensory deficiencies. The soundtrack and audio treatment receive no positive remarks, reinforcing a weak sensory impression.

  • Rewatch Factor 35

    Rewatch potential is limited, with most reviewers advising against repeated viewings due to the film's numerous flaws. A small subset of B‑horror fans and those who found the humor enjoyable suggest some niche appeal, but the consensus indicates minimal lasting interest. Consequently, the film is viewed as lacking the qualities that encourage subsequent watches.

Details

C.O.R.N. Also Known As

Also known as “C.O.R.N: A Field of Screams”.

Also known as
  • C.O.R.N: A Field of Screams

Seen C.O.R.N.?

FAQ

C.O.R.N. FAQ: Cast, Runtime & Release Date

Runtime, release date, director, cast, budget and post-credit scenes of C.O.R.N., each answered in a sentence.

How long is C.O.R.N.?

C.O.R.N. runs 1 hour 42 minutes (102 minutes).

When was C.O.R.N. released?

C.O.R.N. was released on July 30, 2021.

Who directed C.O.R.N.?

C.O.R.N. was directed by Robin Christian.

More films by Robin Christian

Who is in the cast of C.O.R.N.?

C.O.R.N. stars Robert Donavan as Mr. Dr., Roger Cross as Don and Kennedy Tucker as Tia, among 18 credited actors.

What was the budget of C.O.R.N.?

C.O.R.N. had a reported budget of $950,000.

Does C.O.R.N. have a post-credit scene?

No. C.O.R.N. has no extra scene during or after the credits.

Coming soon to your phone

The Plot Explained Movie Summary App

From blockbusters to hidden gems: plot summaries, endings explained and timelines on your phone. Save your favorites and never miss a twist again.

Be the first to know when it launches. Your email stays private, always. Learn more about the app