We Take the Low Road 2019

Art & Craft

In terms of art and craft, the production is described as merely passable, with occasional acknowledgment of decent production values but overall criticism of lackluster direction and uninspired visual style. Reviewers note the absence of artistic elegance and an unremarkable editing rhythm. Consequently, the technical execution is viewed as below average.

Character & Emotion

When it comes to character and emotion, the performances receive mixed remarks, ranging from likeable cast members to outright accusations of awful acting. Some reviewers appreciate brief moments of engaging dialogue, yet the majority find the characters underdeveloped and emotionally flat. Overall, the character work is judged as weak and inconsistent.

Story & Flow

Regarding story and flow, the plot is frequently labeled as slow, uneventful, and ultimately boring. Critics highlight an intriguing premise that fails to sustain momentum, with pacing problems that diminish engagement. The ending offers a modest lift, but it does not sufficiently redeem the overall narrative shortcomings.

Sensory Experience

In the sensory experience domain, the soundtrack and sound design draw particular criticism for being overly loud, cringeworthy, and poorly integrated. Reviewers describe the music as grating alt‑country grit with bad lyrics, contributing to an unpleasant audio environment. Visual style receives little positive comment, reinforcing a generally negative sensory impression.

Rewatch Factor

The rewatch factor is assessed as minimal, with numerous reviewers explicitly stating they would not watch the film again. Boredom, a lack of compelling content, and overall dissatisfaction dominate the feedback, despite occasional acknowledgment of a decent ending. This consensus points to very low replay value and lasting appeal.