This Is Our Home 2019

Art & Craft

In terms of direction and cinematography, reviewers largely describe the film as amateurish, citing repetitive slow‑motion pans and a lack of visual cohesion. Some praise the unconventional, art‑house tone and daring structural choices, noting a distinct atmospheric flavor. However, the overall production design and editing are viewed as under‑developed, resulting in a visual presentation that feels more erratic than polished.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating acting and character depth, critics overwhelmingly note wooden performances, especially from the child protagonist, and forced dialogue that undermines emotional credibility. A singular commendation highlights Simone Policano’s nuanced portrayal, adding a brief point of strength. The film’s attempt at developing a troubled couple is acknowledged, but the overall lack of chemistry and believable interaction limits its emotional resonance.

Story & Flow

The narrative is criticized for incoherent plotting and an unsatisfying conclusion that leaves key questions unanswered. Reviewers describe the script as messy, with pacing that stalls for extended musical sequences, and an ending that feels abruptly truncated. Nonetheless, a portion of the audience appreciates the film’s originality and its bleak, character‑driven horror premise, granting it a modest narrative intrigue despite its structural flaws.

Sensory Experience

The sound design receives mixed feedback; several reviewers praise an unsettling, atmospheric score and effective creepy ambience that enhances tension. Conversely, critics point out prolonged stretches of repetitive music accompanied by slow‑motion visuals that diminish engagement. Visual style is deemed uneven, with occasional striking tonal choices but overall lacking consistency, resulting in a sensory experience that oscillates between compelling and monotonous.

Rewatch Factor

Replay value is generally low, with the majority of reviewers labeling the film a waste of time due to its sluggish pacing and unresolved ending. While a handful of viewers find the eerie atmosphere and unconventional structure engaging enough for a second viewing, the pervasive sense of narrative stagnation and artificial dialogue discourages repeated enjoyment. Consequently, the movie offers limited incentive for rewatching.