Não Vai Ter Golpe! 2019

Art & Craft

In terms of direction and visual craftsmanship, the film receives limited commendation. Reviewers note that the editing mirrors low‑budget YouTube aesthetics, with shallow staging and repetitive visuals that detract from polished cinematography. No commentary praises the production design or technical execution, and criticisms imply a lack of cinematic finesse. Overall, the artistic execution is assessed as below average, reflecting modest production values.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character depth and interview presence, the documentary offers mixed impressions. Some viewers recognize the inclusion of notable figures such as Janaina Paschoal, yet many criticize the portrayals as biased or overly simplistic, reducing complex actors to partisan symbols. The emotional resonance is described as limited, with performances perceived as either propagandistic or inadequately nuanced. Consequently, the character and emotional dimension receives a low‑to‑moderate rating.

Story & Flow

The narrative structure elicits both praise and disapproval. Supporters commend the film for assembling a coherent account of the 2016 impeachment and presenting a perspective they consider historically accurate. Opponents, however, argue the storyline is selective, omitting crucial context and presenting a one‑sided revisionist view. While the pacing and plot progression are generally regarded as clear, the contested factual basis leads to a moderate overall story rating.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements such as sound design and visual style are largely viewed unfavorably. Reviewers describe the audio as functional but unremarkable, and the visual presentation as reminiscent of amateur online videos rather than polished documentary filmmaking. No positive remarks highlight an engaging soundtrack or striking visual motifs, resulting in a low assessment of the sensory experience.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch potential is split among viewers. Advocates argue the film is essential viewing for understanding Brazil's political context, suggesting it merits repeated reference. Critics, however, describe the viewing experience as taxing due to perceived bias and repetitive rhetoric, diminishing desire for subsequent watches. This balanced mixture of endorsement and aversion produces an intermediate rewatch factor score.