Joan of Arc 2019

Art & Craft

In terms of visual and technical craft, the film offers several striking moments but suffers from inconsistent execution. Critics commend the horse‑choreography sequences and the meticulous close‑up composition, while also acknowledging that the visuals only occasionally elevate the work. Negative remarks focus on the drawn‑out runtime and set design that fail to sustain interest, and user comments describe the production as poorly realized. Overall, the art and craft are commendable yet uneven.

Character & Emotion

Character portrayal emerges as a relative strength, though emotional depth varies across the film. Reviewers praise the powerful feminist depiction of Joan and the nuanced close‑ups of Maria Falconetti, as well as the haunting expressiveness of the lead's face. Conversely, some critics argue that a self‑conscious style dulls emotional impact, and the user review highlights subpar acting throughout. The result is a mixed yet respectable performance profile.

Story & Flow

The narrative adopts an unconventional, revisionist angle that intrigues some critics but falters in structural cohesion. Positive commentary notes the film’s odd, fresh retelling of a familiar legend and its thematic boldness. However, several reviewers criticize a rudimentary script, excessive length, and moments where the story feels diluted, a view echoed by the user’s disappointment with the screenplay. Consequently, the story is inventive but hampered by execution flaws.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements such as choreography and close‑up cinematography receive commendation for their artistry, providing moments of visual vigor. Critics also acknowledge that the film’s stylistic choices occasionally succeed in sustaining engagement. At the same time, the stylized pageantry and repetitive sung passages are described as detracting from the overall experience, a point reinforced by user criticism of the musical segments. The sensory impact is thus a blend of highlights and shortcomings.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch potential appears limited due to the film’s polarizing style and narrative pacing. While a niche audience may appreciate its unique approach and thematic boldness, several critics advise against recommendation, citing the bloated runtime and emotional detachment. The user review underscores a strong sense of disappointment, further diminishing appeal for subsequent viewings. In sum, the film offers modest replay value primarily for specialized viewers.