Home Is Where The Killer Is 2019

Art & Craft

In terms of direction and visual craftsmanship, reviewers repeatedly cite amateurish execution and substandard set design. The cinematography receives no praise, and editing is described as disjointed, contributing to a forced and shallow presentation. No positive remarks offset these criticisms, resulting in a low assessment of the film's artistic and technical merit.

Character & Emotion

Acting and character development are generally judged as weak, with many users calling the performances over‑the‑top and unconvincing. A few commentators note occasional solid performances from specific actors, and one review praises nuanced portrayals. However, the prevailing view is that characters lack depth and emotional resonance, leading to a modestly low but not abysmal score.

Story & Flow

The narrative is described as predictable, slow, and uneven, with plots shifting abruptly without justification. Some reviewers acknowledge moments of intrigue and plot twists that add occasional engagement. Despite these isolated positives, the dominant sentiment points to a formulaic and poorly paced storyline, placing the story rating in a lower‑mid range.

Sensory Experience

Sensory elements such as soundtrack and visual style attract little commendation; background music is labeled terrible, and production design is called poor. No reviewer highlights effective sound design or striking visual composition. The cumulative effect is a sensory experience that detracts from immersion, resulting in a low score for this aspect.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch value is generally dismissed, with most users advising against repeat viewings. A minority suggests the film might serve as campy amusement, yet the consensus regards it as lacking lasting appeal or enjoyment on subsequent watches. This consensus drives the rewatch factor to a low rating.