All Light, Everywhere 2021

Art & Craft

Regarding direction, cinematography, and editing, the documentary exhibits moments of sophisticated orchestration, especially in its meta‑visuals and the work of cinematographer Corey Hughes. Critics highlight the intelligent framing of technical processes, yet many point out uneven pacing and a tendency toward dry, fragmented sequences. User feedback frequently mentions poor editing choices and a lack of visual focus, resulting in a mixed appraisal of its artistic craftsmanship.

Character & Emotion

When examining character depth and emotional resonance, the film leans on interviewees and on‑camera moments rather than traditional performances. Critics note occasional nuanced testimonies that convey the human impact of surveillance, but also observe a detached tone that limits empathetic engagement. Several users describe the documentary as lacking compelling personal narratives, reinforcing the sense that emotional connection is sporadic throughout.

Story & Flow

The documentary’s narrative structure strives for originality, weaving historical footage with contemporary case studies. Critics acknowledge its ambitious scope and the thought‑provoking questions it raises, yet many criticize a restless, meandering flow that hampers coherence. Users echo this sentiment, noting that subplots often interrupt the central argument, leaving the overall story feeling fragmented despite moments of insight.

Sensory Experience

In terms of sound and visual style, the film benefits from a polished score by Dan Deacon and deliberate framing that underscores its thematic concerns. Critics praise the auditory landscape and the meticulous composition of scenes, describing the sensory elements as a strong unifying factor. No significant negative feedback appears regarding the soundtrack or visual design, indicating a consistently high sensory execution.

Rewatch Factor

The documentary provokes sustained contemplation about surveillance technology, prompting viewers to revisit its layered arguments and visual examples. Critics highlight its capacity to generate further thought and its thoughtful meditation on law‑enforcement practices, suggesting lasting relevance. While some user comments lament its unfocused segments, the presence of compelling case studies and a memorable score support a reasonable likelihood of repeat viewings for audiences interested in its subject matter.