Documentary

11/8/16 (2017): Cast & Ratings

Name: 11/8/16
Genre: Documentary
Released: 2017-11-03
Duration: 1 h 44 min
Cast: Abby Linne

11/8/16 is a 2017 documentary directed by Alison Klayman and Don Argott, starring Abby Linne. It runs 1 hour 44 minutes. Critics gave it 77% on Rotten Tomatoes and 62 on Metacritic, and IMDb users rate it 5.7/10.

IMDb rating: 5.7/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 77%
Echo Score: 74
Metascore: 62

Loading streaming availability…

Released: November 3, 2017
Runtime: 1h 44m (104 min)
Directors: Alison Klayman , Don Argott and Bassam Tariq
Genre: Documentary
Original language: English
Studio: The Orchard
After the credits: No No extra scene

The story

What Is 11/8/16 About?

The premise of 11/8/16 without spoilers.

On November 2016, as the nation held its breath awaiting the presidential election results, this documentary offers a revealing look at voters across 25 states. The film captures the anticipation and emotion of Election Day, from the first polls opening to the tense hours leading up to the final counts. Through intimate interviews, it explores the hopes, fears, and perspectives of Americans on a day that would profoundly shape the country's future.

11/8/16 Themes & Keywords

· 3 tags

propaganda
date in title
2010s

Loading streaming availability…

Cast & crew

11/8/16 Cast

Abby Linne stars in 11/8/16. Directed by Alison Klayman, Don Argott and Bassam Tariq.

Co-director Alison Klayman
Co-director Don Argott
Co-director Bassam Tariq
Co-director Yung Chang
Co-director Michael Tucker
Co-director Petra Epperlein
Co-director Elaine McMillion Sheldon
Co-director Alma Har'el
Co-director Vikram Gandhi
Co-director Andrew Grace
Co-director Ciara Lacy
Co-director Daniel Junge
Co-director Duane Andersen
Co-director Garth Donovan
Co-director J. Gonçalves
Co-director Martha Shane
Co-director Raul Gasteazoro
Co-director Sheena M. Joyce

Abby Linne as themselves

From the directors

More from the Directors of 11/8/16

More films directed by the directors of 11/8/16, best-rated first: King Coal, DIO: Dreamers Never Die, This Is Not a Movie and Wuhan Wuhan.

Ratings

11/8/16 Reviews & Ratings

Critics gave 11/8/16 77% on Rotten Tomatoes and 62 on Metacritic, and IMDb users rate it 5.7/10. Our Echo Score gives it 74/100, strongest in art & craft (75) and weakest in story & flow (65).

74 /100

11/8/16 Echo Score Breakdown

11/8/16 delivers a composed yet lively documentary structure that captures the unsettled mood of Election Day 2016. The film’s interwoven segments maintain engagement through measured pacing and focused editing, although the proximity to events limits fresh insight. The diverse perspectives evoke emotional resonance, while the minute-by-minute chronology reinforces historical immediacy. Yet the close distance to the events tempers originality and broader context. Overall, the documentary offers a moderately compelling account that benefits from strong craft but shows occasional constraints in depth and novelty.

Our own 0–100 rating, built from five aspects: art, character, story, the sensory experience and how well a film rewatches.

Art & Craft 75

In terms of art direction and editing, 11/8/16 demonstrates thoughtful assembly of footage with clear visual coherence. The smooth editorial transitions and focused framing convey the immediacy of Election Day. Some critics noted the curation feels excessive, reducing nuanced visuals to demographic snapshots. Overall, the craft supports engagement yet occasionally appears overly calibrated in its presentation.
Character & Emotion 70

When it comes to character and emotion, the documentary provides a varied cross-section of individuals, eliciting empathetic responses through closeups and personal testimonies. The multiple viewpoints highlight societal tensions without defaulting to stereotypes. A few observers felt the portrait reduced subjects to broad demographic types, limiting deeper character insight. Ultimately, the emotional resonance is present but sometimes restrained by its scope.
Story & Flow 65

In terms of story and flow, the film maintains a consistent live chronology that sustains viewer interest. The pacing remains measured and the minute-by-minute structure underscores historical immediacy. However, the proximity to the actual event diminishes narrative originality, and some accounts offer limited new information. As a result, the storytelling feels engaging but occasionally familiar and lacking in fresh perspective.
Sensory Experience 70

In terms of sensory experience, the documentary’s visual style relies on tight framing and ambient sound to evoke tension. The anxious textures of crowds and real-time audio create an immersive environment. Yet the soundtrack remains subtle, and the overall sound design is unobtrusive. Consequently, the sensory dimension is engaging but operates within restrained production parameters.
Rewatch Factor 75

When it comes to rewatch value, 11/8/16 promises enhanced insight once emotional intensity subsides. The film’s historical immediacy and layered perspectives may reward future viewings, especially as temporal distance provides context. In its current state, the proximity to the events can overwhelm repeated viewings. Ultimately, the documentary holds moderate replay appeal but may gain significance over time.