Logo What's After the Movie
The Trial of the Chicago 7

The Trial of the Chicago 7 2020

Directed by

Aaron Sorkin

Aaron Sorkin

Made by

Netflix

Netflix

Test your knowledge of The Trial of the Chicago 7 with our quiz!

Plot Summary

Read the complete plot summary and ending explained for The Trial of the Chicago 7 (2020). From turning points to emotional moments, uncover what really happened and why it matters.


In August 1968, a group of activists including Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, David Dellinger, Lee Weiner, John Froines, and Bobby Seale gather to plan a demonstration at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. However, five months later, they find themselves arrested on charges of “crossing state lines” to incite a riot. The prosecution is led by John N. Mitchell, who appoints prosecutors Tom Foran and Richard Schultz to handle the case, while all defendants except Seale have legal representation from William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass.

The trial is overseen by Judge Julius Hoffman, who exhibits clear bias towards the prosecution, notably insisting that he and Abbie Hoffman are not related. Due to illness, Seale’s attorney, Charles Garry, cannot attend, prompting Judge Hoffman to compel Kunstler to represent Seale, a move both Kunstler and Seale vehemently oppose. Throughout the proceedings, Seale receives support from Fred Hampton, a fact that Judge Hoffman misinterprets as legal counsel. Meanwhile, Abbie’s blatant disdain for the court contributes to growing tensions, leading to Judge Hoffman dismissing two jurors suspected of sympathizing with the defendants, claiming threats from the Black Panther Party as the reason.

As the trial unfolds, police and FBI testimonies spotlight growing hostilities. When Hayden spots two officers following Davis during the convention, he attempts to deflate their tire but is caught and arrested. This act spurs Abbie and the others to protest at the police station, but they are met with a police blockade, resulting in chaotic clashes between the protestors and law enforcement.

Tragedy strikes when the defendants learn that Fred Hampton was killed in a police raid, a catalyst that intensifies the situation in court. In response to Seale’s vocal defense of his rights, Judge Hoffman has him forcibly removed, beaten, and returned to the courtroom in a degrading condition, gagged and chained. Such actions lead to objections from both the defense and the prosecution, ultimately compelling Judge Hoffman to declare a mistrial for Seale’s case.

The defense brings forward Ramsey Clark, the Attorney General during the tumultuous events, to assert that he had avoided launching prosecutions due to evidence that the Chicago Police Department instigated the riots. However, Judge Hoffman denies Clark the opportunity to testify before the jury, dismissing the relevance of his claims. The atmosphere in the courtroom becomes increasingly volatile, culminating in Dellinger’s outburst that results in his arrest after he strikes a bailiff.

Kunstler subsequently reveals a tape that implicates Hayden, preparing him for cross-examination. During the chaotic night of the riots, Hayden notices Davis trying to calm officers who were aggressively handling a protester climbing a flagpole. When Davis is assaulted by police, an inflamed Hayden asserts, > “If blood is going to flow, then let it flow all over the city!” This moment leads to violent repercussions, as the defendants suffer brutal beatings at the hands of the police.

Amidst the courtroom drama, Abbie discerns that Hayden’s words may be exploited during the trial, prompting Hayden to request Abbie to take the stand in his place. Abbie agrees, recognizing the weight of the situation.

As the trial concludes, Judge Hoffman surprisingly grants Hayden the opportunity to speak, remarking on his apparent remorse. However, contrary to Hoffman’s expectations, Hayden seizes this moment to blast the ongoing Vietnam War by recounting the 4,752 soldiers that have fallen since the beginning of the trial. His emotional plea resonates deeply with the courtroom, prompting many present to rise in applause, including Schultz, who stands in an act of respect for the sacrifices made. This powerful moment encapsulates the emotional and ethical stakes at play throughout the trial, leaving a significant mark on all who witness it.

Timeline

Follow the complete movie timeline of The Trial of the Chicago 7 (2020) with every major event in chronological order. Great for understanding complex plots and story progression.


Preparation for Protest

In August 1968, a group of activists including Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and Tom Hayden organize to protest at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. They gather to strategize their actions aimed at highlighting the political issues of the time.

August 1968 Chicago

Arrests and Charges

Five months after the protest, the group is arrested and charged with crossing state lines to incite a riot. The charges spark national attention as the defendants, including key figures like Hoffman and Hayden, prepare for a controversial trial.

January 1969

Appointment of Prosecutors

John N. Mitchell, the Attorney General, appoints Tom Foran and Richard Schultz as the lead prosecutors for the case. This decision underscores the high-stakes nature of the trial and the government's determination to prosecute the defendants.

Judge's Prejudice

During the trial, Judge Julius Hoffman exhibits significant bias towards the prosecution. His insistence on the separation of his name from Abbie Hoffman's leads to tensions that color the entire courtroom proceedings.

Courtroom

Contempt of Court

Judge Hoffman charges the defendants and their attorneys with contempt of court multiple times, further escalating the tension in the courtroom. This conflict exemplifies the judge's animosity towards the defendants' attempts to stand up for their rights.

Courtroom

Undercover Testimonies

Numerous undercover police officers and FBI agents testify during the trial, painting a picture of chaos during the protests. These testimonies contribute to the prosecution's narrative of a riot incited by the defendants.

Courtroom

Police Confrontation

During the protests, tensions boil over when police and protesters clash. Activist Tom Hayden notices police officers following their group. When he attempts to let the air out of one officer's tire, he is caught and arrested.

Chicago

The Riot Erupts

On the day of the convention, protesters led by Abbie and others try to confront the police, only to find the police had set up a blockade. This leads to a violent confrontation, resulting in a chaotic riot between police forces and protesters.

August 1968 Chicago

Fred Hampton's Death

Following the protests, the defendants learn of Fred Hampton's tragic death during a police raid. His killing raises the stakes for Bobby Seale, who continues to vocalize his rights in the courtroom.

Seale's Mistreatment

Judge Hoffman orders Bobby Seale to be beaten and returned to the courtroom gagged and chained after Seale’s continued requests for representation. This shocking act causes outrage among both the defense and prosecution.

Courtroom

Testimony of Ramsey Clark

Ramsey Clark, the former Attorney General, is called to the stand by the defense. However, Judge Hoffman denies him the opportunity to speak before the jury, limiting the defense's ability to challenge the prosecution's claims.

Courtroom

Dellinger's Arrest

In a dramatic moment, activist David Dellinger punches a bailiff in response to escalating tensions in the courtroom. This act leads to his immediate arrest and illustrates the heightened emotions surrounding the trial.

Courtroom

Closing Remarks by Hayden

During closing arguments, Tom Hayden, feeling remorseful, seizes the opportunity to name the soldiers killed in the Vietnam War since the trial began. This powerful moment resonates deeply within the courtroom, drawing applause from the audience.

Courtroom

Trial Conclusion

As the trial comes to a close, the emotional weight of the proceedings leaves a lasting impact on those present. Hayden's heartfelt remarks, despite Judge Hoffman's objections, resonate with many, showing the intersection of activism and justice.

Courtroom

Characters

Explore all characters from The Trial of the Chicago 7 (2020). Get detailed profiles with their roles, arcs, and key relationships explained.


Abbie Hoffman

Abbie Hoffman is a charismatic and irreverent activist who becomes a central figure during the trial. Known for his humor and defiance, he challenges the court's authority while advocating for his beliefs and his fellow defendants' rights.

👤 Activist ⚡ Outspoken 🥳 Charismatic

Tom Hayden

Tom Hayden is a passionate and committed activist representative of the movement, grappling with the consequences of his words and actions. Throughout the trial, he demonstrates growth, striving for justice while confronting the realities of their situation.

🗣️ Activist 🧠 Thoughtful 💪 Resilient

Bobby Seale

Bobby Seale is a powerful and steadfast leader of the Black Panther Party, who faces severe prejudice in court. His character highlights the intersection of race and justice, illustrating the extremes of the legal system during that era.

✊ Activist ⚔️ Strong-willed 🖤 Resilient

Judge Julius Hoffman

Judge Julius Hoffman is depicted as a figure of authority who displays significant bias against the defendants. His prejudiced rulings and disruptive courtroom behavior serve to amplify the tension and highlight systemic injustices.

⚖️ Authority 🔍 Biased 🎩 Control

Setting

Learn where and when The Trial of the Chicago 7 (2020) takes place. Explore the film’s settings, era, and how they shape the narrative.


Time period

1968

The year 1968 was marked by widespread social unrest and political upheaval across the United States, particularly surrounding issues of civil rights and the Vietnam War. Young Americans protested against government decisions, leading to pivotal moments in the push for change and justice.

Location

Chicago

Chicago, a vibrant and historical city in the Midwest of the United States, was a focal point for political activism during the 1960s. Known for its diverse culture and architecture, it became the stage for significant protests and movements, especially during the Democratic National Convention in 1968.

🏙️ City 📅 1960s

Themes

Discover the main themes in The Trial of the Chicago 7 (2020). Analyze the deeper meanings, emotional layers, and social commentary behind the film.


⚖️

Justice

The theme of justice is woven throughout the film as the defendants face a biased legal system in a highly publicized trial. It critiques the integrity of the judicial process and emphasizes the struggle for fairness, especially for marginalized voices during tumultuous times.

Activism

Activism is a central theme, highlighting the courage and determination of individuals fighting for their beliefs. The film showcases the power of protest and the role of young people in challenging authority, making it a poignant reflection on civil disobedience.

💔

Solidarity

The theme of solidarity is evident, as the characters unite against oppression and the injustices they face in the courtroom and society. Their shared experiences and struggles form a bond that underscores the importance of community in the fight for rights.

The Trial of the Chicago 7 Ending Explained

Unravel the ending of The Trial of the Chicago 7 (2020) with our detailed explanation. Understand the final scenes, character fates, and unresolved questions.


The ending of The Trial of the Chicago 7 underscores the triumph of resilience and moral conviction over corruption and abuse of power. Throughout the film, we see that despite the blatant manipulation of the trial by those in authority—who blatantly distort facts, fabricate evidence, and manipulate jurors—the accused remain steadfast in their beliefs. Their fight is not just against the specific charges but against a system that seeks to silence dissent and maintain control through injustice. The final courtroom scenes reveal that even as the legal process is rigged and the verdict seems predetermined, the voices of these activists echo beyond the courtroom walls, inspiring viewers to question authority and cherish the importance of free speech and civil resistance.

In the end, the film leaves us with the powerful message that democracy’s strength lies in its ability to withstand such oppressive tactics. The characters, especially those like Abbie Hoffman and Tom Hayden, show that true activism does not end with legal battles; it’s a call for lasting change rooted in moral courage. The verdict may be unjust, but their refusal to be silenced affirms that dissent, when held with conviction, has the power to challenge even the most manipulated and corrupt systems. Ultimately, the film suggests that even in the face of systemic injustice, the true spirit of democracy endures in the collective stand for truth and justice, which can ignite change across generations.

Movies with Similar Twists and Themes

Uncover films that echo the narrative beats, emotional arcs, or dramatic twists of the one you're exploring. These recommendations are handpicked based on story depth, thematic resonance, and spoiler-worthy moments — perfect for fans who crave more of the same intrigue.


© 2025 What's After the Movie. All rights reserved.