Feral State 2021

Art & Craft

In terms of art and craft, the film’s cinematography is frequently cited as a strong point, with several reviewers noting its on‑point framing and gritty visual tone. Production design leverages real Citrus County locations, adding authenticity. However, editing suffers from rapid, disjointed scene changes, and the direction shows signs of inexperience, resulting in uneven pacing. Overall, the technical execution is modest but not without merit.

Character & Emotion

When evaluating character and emotion, performances are polarized. Ronnie Gene Blevins receives consistent acknowledgment for anchoring the film, and Sif Saga’s debut is praised as natural and compelling. Conversely, other actors are described as unconvincing or prone to over‑the‑top delivery, and several reviewers label the acting overall as weak. This blend of standout moments amid generally inconsistent portrayals yields a mixed character impression.

Story & Flow

The story and flow suffer from a lack of coherence, with many reviewers calling the plot convoluted, disjointed, and at times nonsensical. Pacing issues are highlighted, especially rapid scene shifts that hinder narrative continuity. While a few notes mention intrigue and tension that sustain interest until the end, the overarching impression is that the screenplay fails to deliver a clear, engaging arc.

Sensory Experience

Regarding sensory experience, the film’s score is described as decent for a B‑movie, and the sound design supports its gritty atmosphere. Visuals benefit from authentic location shooting, giving local viewers nostalgic resonance. Nevertheless, some viewers note inconsistent audio levels and occasional technical roughness that detract from immersion. Overall, the sensory elements provide a solid, if not polished, backdrop to the narrative.

Rewatch Factor

Replay value is mixed; the film’s nostalgic appeal to locals and occasional moments of tension invite a second look, yet the uneven plot and inconsistent acting limit broader rewatch enthusiasm. Some reviewers suggest the story could have worked better as a series, hinting at untapped depth. Consequently, the film offers modest lasting appeal but does not strongly encourage repeated viewings.