Conjuring the Devil 2020

Art & Craft

In terms of art and craft, most reviewers faulted the film’s visual execution. Critics repeatedly noted jarring camera angles, amateurish composition, and excessive jump cuts that undermined immersion. The majority described the cinematography as resembling an Instagram story rather than a polished horror picture. Only one reviewer praised the cinematography and CGI, but this view is outweighed by the pervasive negative feedback, indicating weak art direction overall.

Character & Emotion

Character and emotional elements received predominantly poor assessments. Viewers disparaged the acting as “hilariously bad,” “terrible,” and lacking any credible chemistry, with several remarks that the performers resembled non‑actors. While one user mentioned the cast was merely adequate for a low‑budget production, the overwhelming consensus describes the performances as flat, uninspired, and detrimental to any emotional engagement the film attempts.

Story & Flow

Story and flow were widely criticized for incoherence and lack of purpose. Multiple reviewers called the plot weak, boring, nonsensical, and over‑extended, with pacing that dragged beyond the necessary length. The few positive comments highlighted a handful of inventive setups, yet the prevailing view describes an underdeveloped narrative that fails to sustain interest, rendering the film’s storytelling ineffective.

Sensory Experience

Sensory experience, including sound design and visual cohesion, attracted mixed remarks but leaned negative. Critics complained about harsh jump cuts and jarring visuals that disrupted atmosphere, while a lone enthusiast praised the soundtrack and CGI as comparable to major sci‑fi productions. The overall sentiment suggests that any technical merits are eclipsed by inconsistent audio‑visual execution, resulting in a subpar sensory impact.

Rewatch Factor

Rewatch potential was uniformly low, with most viewers stating they would not return to the film due to its tedious pacing and lack of engaging content. The singular positive appraisal hinted at possible enjoyment with companions, yet the dominant consensus marks the movie as unworthy of repeated viewings, reflecting minimal lasting appeal.