Logo What's After the Movie

What's After the Blog?

OpinionsReception

Carry-On (2024) Review: User and Critic Opinions on Reception and Storytelling

Explore user and critic reactions to Carry-On (2024), focusing on performance, storytelling, and the film's reception within its franchise context. Discover what fans and movie critics are saying about this thrilling TSA adventure.

June 14, 2025

Carry-On (2024) Review: User and Critic Opinions on Reception and Storytelling

Movies mentioned in this article


Review Opinions on Carry-On (2024): The Cinema Reception Analyzed

Introduction: An Overview of Carry-On’s Reception

The Carry-On movie, set to release on December 13, 2024, has garnered a wide array of reviews that range from enthusiastic praise to pointed critiques. Audiences and critics alike are buzzing about the film’s intense action and engaging plot dynamics, while some express concerns over its pacing and logical coherence. At What’s After the Movie, we aim to dissect the various opinions surrounding this anticipated picture, unlocking insights into how different groups perceive it. For a comprehensive exploration of the film’s intricacies, visit our Carry-On movie page.

Diverse Critical Perspectives on Carry-On: From High Praise to Serious Critique

The reception of Carry-On has been polarizing among film critics. Notably, The Playlist awarded the film an impressive score of 83, referencing its “no-fuss-no-muss approach” and the strong performances that contribute to its compelling nature. This ethos runs counter to reviews from more critical outlets like The Guardian, which scored the film 40, suggesting it lacked the classic elements needed for a gripping experience. Critics are torn on whether the film’s predictability diminishes its effectiveness or if its well-crafted simplicity elevates it as an audience-pleaser. Supported by our detailed summary page, this dichotomy showcases the challenge in balancing innovation with familiar tropes.

Empire’s review takes a more favorable position, likening Carry-On to “Die Hard karaoke,” indicating that while it may follow a classic formula, it still delivers entertainment value: “it eclipses at least two of John McClane’s outings.” Here, a common theme emerges: the film understands its genre and embraces it, which resonates with critics seeking both nostalgia and excitement.

User Reactions: A Mixed Bag of Experiences

Audiences have expressed a blend of satisfaction and disappointment, with many highlighting engaging twists and the solid performances of lead actors. User KhalielPrime remarked, “the tension is well maintained,” yet lamented the film’s length. Meanwhile, other viewers felt it was a classic example of a formulaic thriller that failed to surprise. User rockytopthad stated, “There are just too many examples of plot details that are logically one-in-a-million unlikely,” reflecting a sentiment echoed by several users.

Strong performances from Taron Egerton and Jason Bateman have been frequently cited, yet issues with writing and believability detract from the overall experience for many. As noted in my interview with fellow cinema enthusiasts, users appreciate when films maintain a visceral connection, which Carry-On seems to offer for some, but fails to deliver for others. For more information about user ratings, check our Box Office page where we break down performance metrics.

Comparing Critics and Audience Scores: What’s the Consensus?

The disparity between critical and user scores is notable, revealing intriguing insights into how Carry-On is received by various demographics. With a Metacritic score of 70, critics are generally leaning towards a favorable view, whereas user ratings hover around the 6 range, indicating a more tempered enthusiasm among the general public. As RogerEbert.com notes, “it’s a bit too long and a lot too silly, but most people won’t care,” supporting the notion that while critics focus more on depth, audiences tend to value entertainment and escapism.

The film’s ability to capture the essence of holiday thrillers is echoed in reviews from outlets like We Got This Covered, which emphasize “dramatically satisfying” elements that thrill fans of the genre. Comparatively, it’s clear that while the critics appreciate the film’s craftsmanship, audience members are more drawn to its entertainment value, as they often seek films that won’t demand too much analytical effort.

Conclusion: Carry-On’s Future Among Cinema Goers

As Carry-On sets out to charm viewers this December, early insights reveal a film that splices traditional action genre elements with modern thrills. Critical reviews illustrate a mixed bag of sentiments; while many celebrate the performances and pacing, detractors point out clichés and logical missteps. Fans can engage with the dialogue through our Quizzes and games or explore character dynamics on our Movie Wiki.

In summation, Carry-On serves as a reminder of cinema’s dual nature—far from perfect but full of potential enjoyment. Join the conversation at What’s After the Movie and explore your perspective on this exciting new release.

LinkDescription
MetacriticMovie reviews and scores
Rotten TomatoesTomatoes meter and critic opinions
IMDbInformation and user ratings
TMDBMovie database and details
WikipediaFilm overview and history
Just WatchStreaming options and availability
LetterboxdCommunity reviews and ratings
Movie InsiderFilm news and updates
Box Office MojoBox office performance
Common SenseFamily-friendly reviews
IMCDBVehicles in film database

© 2025 What's After the Movie. All rights reserved.